Jed we have been through this twice already. I do not find anything
Rossi has said shows that he was cheating.
The agreement at the start of the trial was that no one from IH should
visit J M Products, nor that anyone from J M Products was allowed to
visit the 1 MW plant. Presumably both had proprietary secrets. You
keep ignoring this and keep claiming it was Rossi who stopped IH from
visiting.
You have no idea what machinery was in the J M Products' plant although
you also imply that you know.
You still have not given a reference for the supposed customer IH found
before J M Products.
Nether you nor I know if the plant was inspected but if it was it would
be for safety reasons only and possibly Rossi's safety certificate had a
bearing on that.
On 7/3/2016 8:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
But I have reason whatsoever to believe that somebody's idea of
how Rossi could cheat was actually implemented.
Yes, you do have a clear idea. The person who told you how Rossi
cheats is Rossi himself. He said refused to allow anyone into his
pretend customer site. The only plausible reason for doing that is to
hide the fact that there is only a 15 kW radiator in there. Other
reasons that have been suggested are absurd. If there was an actual
machine in there, Rossi would be paid $89 million for showing it to
the I.H. experts. There is no way he would fail to do that.
It is obvious he is covering up fraud by doing that. Add to that the
fact that there is no heat or noise coming from the pretend customer
site, and it is case closed.
Here is his latest outrageous lie, by the way. These are my comments
at lenr-forum:
Thinking more about what Rossi said here: "b) Obviously it is false,
otherwise the plant would have been closed after the inspections . . ."
Parsing this, he claims:
1. There were inspections.
2. After these inspections, the plant remained open.
3. Therefore it passed.
I find this improbable. I think it is extremely unlikely that the
state of Florida has a set of procedures to inspect or certify an
aneutronic cold fusion nuclear reactor. Most scientists do not think
such a thing can exist.
I suppose that if an inspector from Florida came, made measurements,
and determined that the machine was producing far more output heat
than the input electricity, he would not merely shrug his shoulders,
sign off on the safety certificate, and go back to the office. This
would be an unprecedented inspection. It would be unlike anything that
has ever happened in Florida, or the U.S. or anywhere in the world. I
think the inspector would be at a loss as to what to do. He would
report this to his superiors. A Boiler Safety Section inspector would
never take full responsibility for certifying such a machine on his
own authority. They, in turn would be astounded, and they would take
action and do something about it. Public safety officials when
confronted by something that sounds very dangerous, with no legal
codes to guide them, do not merely turn away and ignore it. Their
first instinct would be to close it down and ask the next higher set
of officials for guidance. If there was some sort of accident, these
officials would lose their jobs and possibly face a jail sentence, so
they would take action.
I find it absolutely impossible to believe that the authorities in the
Boiler Safety Section would _ignore a nuclear reactor that works by
unknown principles_, one that is producing dangerous levels of heat in
a building not zoned for that. They would not let Rossi go on testing
this device in a building with other people, in a crowded neighborhood.
To be blunt, I think the scenario outlined by Rossi in this one
sentence is so utterly improbable that it is either a lie or a lunatic
fantasy. I cannot imagine why anyone believes him, or takes this at
face value.
- Jed
