Craig Haynie <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I were Rossi, what I would want is an independent evaluation of the > device, from which, neither side could dispute the results. > He did not do that. On the contrary, his test was a farce. It was as bad as his previous tests. Anyone with knowledge of calorimetry will dismiss the results. > It is just way too much time to waste on another demonstration test for IH. > In one week, he could have easily proved to everyone's satisfaction that the machine works. There was never any need to spend one year. That was his idea. He insisted on it. There was also no need to make a 1 MW reactor. He insisted on that as well. A small reactor would have been much easier to test and it would have given better results. > So Rossi may be a fraud, but if he's legitimate, then his behavior during > the test is totally expected. > I do not understand why you would expect this. But I would say this behavior would only be totally expected from someone who is committing fraud. - Jed
