Rossi doesn't sound too worried 1. JP Renoir August 7, 2016 at 6:24 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=149#comment-1213469>
Dear Andrea Rossi, I have just finished to read the 66 pages of the counter complaints of IH, but they are just making assumption on the base of which make slanders. They did not bring on a single proof of what they say, just shoot accusations. Anyway: is there at least one accusation you consider dangerous or sustainable ? Cheers, JPR 2. Andrea Rossi August 7, 2016 at 6:41 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=149#comment-1213471> JP Renoir: Honestly, there is not a single and I repeat a single point in all the 66 pages that we will not be able to cancel with due evidence in Court. I repeat: these 66 pages are a gold mine, because in all their points they give evidence of the vicious falsity of our foe; sometimes such falsity assumes comic aspects, as we’ll see in due time, in due place. They are not ashamed to slander persons with the goal to avoid to have to pay. By the way, to understand the way to do things of these guys, go to read on this blog the links in the comment of Jill posted on 2016/08/06 at 5:31 PM Warm Regards, A.R.
