Jed, how much of Rossi's data do you have? Days; weeks? How do you got them? How would you convince us that you have them indeed? I confess that after what you have told about knowledgeable people being those who know to cheat with an instrument I cannot belive anything you say without proofs. Your statement was structurally dishonest. peter
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I'm really curious to know why IH is providing you with so much data >> about their internal workings. >> > > Much of what I report comes from people outside of I.H. who visited Rossi. > Some of it comes from Rossi. He is pissed off that I know it. > > > The only reason I can think of is that they are using you to spread their >> side of the story. >> > > Mainly I am telling you Rossi's side of the story! That is what is ironic. > His log books and his data reveal that he is lying. Many people saw that. > 36,000 kg flow per day? Exactly?!? Give me a break! Do you believe that? > How naive are you? His own operator log books show the machine was turned > off on some dates, or half turned off, yet the data log books for those > same dates show 1 MW of constant heat. That's impossible! > > > >> Obviously one party is lying. There is no proof yet which one and I take >> the position of waiting for facts. >> > > There is tons of proof. Rossi's own statements about the customer site > being super-secret closed off is pure bosh. The notion that you could have > 1 MW in that space with no ventilation and no detection of the heat is > impossible. The numbers he gave Lewan in the interview are ridiculous. His > claims are full of holes. The fact that he never responded to the questions > in Exhibit 5 show that he is an outrageous liar. The fact that he has never > given out any data should tell you all you need to know. > > If you ask him about the statements in Exhibit 5, he will deny them all, > but I know them all to be true, and I have that confirmed from sources > outside of I.H., mainly from Rossi himself. > > > >> You apparently have already decided Rossi is guilty, without hearing >> his side of the story. >> > > I have his data! I know more about his side of the story than you do, by a > wide margin. And by the way, why didn't he present his side of the story in > the lawsuit? Why is there not a single technical assertion in that? Why has > he not revealed any numbers or data in his blog? Don't tell he is > prohibited. That's absurd. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
