a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm really curious to know why IH is providing you with so much data about > their internal workings. > Much of what I report comes from people outside of I.H. who visited Rossi. Some of it comes from Rossi. He is pissed off that I know it. The only reason I can think of is that they are using you to spread their > side of the story. > Mainly I am telling you Rossi's side of the story! That is what is ironic. His log books and his data reveal that he is lying. Many people saw that. 36,000 kg flow per day? Exactly?!? Give me a break! Do you believe that? How naive are you? His own operator log books show the machine was turned off on some dates, or half turned off, yet the data log books for those same dates show 1 MW of constant heat. That's impossible! > Obviously one party is lying. There is no proof yet which one and I take > the position of waiting for facts. > There is tons of proof. Rossi's own statements about the customer site being super-secret closed off is pure bosh. The notion that you could have 1 MW in that space with no ventilation and no detection of the heat is impossible. The numbers he gave Lewan in the interview are ridiculous. His claims are full of holes. The fact that he never responded to the questions in Exhibit 5 show that he is an outrageous liar. The fact that he has never given out any data should tell you all you need to know. If you ask him about the statements in Exhibit 5, he will deny them all, but I know them all to be true, and I have that confirmed from sources outside of I.H., mainly from Rossi himself. > You apparently have already decided Rossi is guilty, without hearing his > side of the story. > I have his data! I know more about his side of the story than you do, by a wide margin. And by the way, why didn't he present his side of the story in the lawsuit? Why is there not a single technical assertion in that? Why has he not revealed any numbers or data in his blog? Don't tell he is prohibited. That's absurd. - Jed
