Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: I told tyht what yoiu said- re cheating with flowmeters is totally false > and imoral. >
It is not false at all. It is true, and there is physical proof of that, in the stains in the pipe and elsewhere. > Youi have shown that the flowmeter used by Rossi can have some error if > working a bit under the minimum flow not that he made frsud. I hope you > will abandon this moronism with pipes half full. > For crying out loud! Half-empty pipes are common. Any plumber knows how to make a pipe half empty. There is nothing "moronic" about it. It was obvious to all observers this pipe was half empty. It had to be, given its position in the setup. The rust stains in the pipe confirmed this, as did additional testing. As regarding Defkalion, they wanted to speak with you but then they were > informed that you are working for a group interested in their IP aand have > told ou to not come. From here your hatred. > I have nothing to do with Defkalion or the crimes they committed. They lied to you. I was not working with any such group. The only reason I hate them is because they defrauded DE. They did nothing to me, other than stiffing me for $1,200. As regarding the Gambearle report it is about error not fraud. > Don't be ridiculous. Read the report: . . . DGT did not allow DE to use such measurement in any of the tests of their technology. As a further improvement we added a second flowmeter upstream of the water system in order to verify the behavior of the main flowmeter during the measurement of the excess power but also in this case the added flowmeter was readily removed by the DGT technicians forbidding us to make any verification. - In no case has DGT enabled DE engineers to attend the assembly phase of the active components in the reaction chamber of the reactor R5 (built by us according to the DGT diagrams) nor left the reactor R5 complete with all the necessary elements for running the experiment in the DE laboratories without their physical presence. The total lack of cooperation from the part of DGT regarding both the technical information and crosschecks have made it necessary to carry out independent verification tests of the calorimetric measurements of excess power, especially to protect clients who were about to sign trade agreements and pay fees for the access to the DGT technology. We were not able to make a direct measurement of the pressure fluctuations in the hydraulic circuit because we were not allowed by DGT to make any change in the hydraulic system . . . DE has not been put in a position to carry out independent tests on the technology outside of a strict protocol defined by DGT and all the tests that DE has witnessed, even in its laboratories, have always been performed entirely by technicians from DGT (HJ and AS). During the periods when the DGT staff was not present at the DE site some component considered essential for obtaining the reaction was removed in order to prevent DE from making independent tests. . . ." http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GamberaleLfinaltechn.pdf That is not a mistake. That's fraud. DE put themselves out of business, and DGT vanished. > You say you worked with flowmeters, can you mimick the logical results > from the 9 hours yest at ICCF-18 working with two simple valves and a > flowmeter? Can you attain controllable reverse flaw? > Gamberale's report proves that is what they did. They never denied it. They vanished, instead. That's what frauds do when someone catches them. - Jed
