How somebody can read the following email of Rossi and still not "get it"? He has a conniving mind, zero loyalty and it is evident he is capable of manipulating experiments, "making up discussions" whatever that means, taking advantage of people and situations. Given his already tattered past, it is more than clear he should not be trusted under any circumstances. Yes, he "did a masterpiece" as he claimed, a masterpiece of fraud and manipulation having so many people believing in him and his bullshit.
Rossi's lies, manipulations and scheming: "With this company Hydrofusion we [meaning Leonardo and Rossi] had agreed upon a draft to sell them IP, know how and manufacturing license for Europe but Germany, France and Italy. By our law, if you send a proposal you are engaged to accept if the proposee accepts all the conditions of the proposal. After receiving your last text at the end of August I decided to go ahead with you, therefore I had to get rid of this engagement. The only way out was to invite them to a test, ask them to bring with them their consultant. I made the test abort, maintaining the temperatures below the starting limit. Then I made up some discussions, I said they made a wrong test, they escaped, I am free. We did not have damages of image, because, knowing what was on the road, I had made before their test a disclaimer, saying that the Hot temperature E-Cat was just a prototype, still under test and validation and subject to modification, thing that I am repeating everywhere. Now I am publishing that I am surprised of all this ado for nothing, since I already said that for the Hot Cat we needed more tests before saying it is a product ready for the market. At this point we can organize with Cherokee a world strategy, since all the other licensees are just commercial: for example in Africa we will have just to pay a royalty to the local agent upon our sale price, but they all are very good and they can sell either energy or plants. Nobody has rights upon the IP, know how, manufacturing and so on. Warmest Regards, Andrea" On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:02 AM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Jed, > You left out most of what I wrote, cherry picking like Murray does. > You claim to know what I WILL think. What you write is not believable. > You are wrong about that too. > > > > On 8/12/2016 9:56 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Jed Rossi and Penon stuffed their data tables with identical & >> impossible numbers, and they showed excess power on days when Rossi in his >> blog said the machine was turned off. >> AA How can one tell that without seeing Penon's report? Second hand info >> from Murray is not proof. >> > > You have second hand info from me and from Murray. If that is not proof > enough, you will not believe Penon's report either. You will say it is fake. > > What you are saying here is that Murray and I are liars. There is no > response I can make to that which will change your mind. The conversation > is at an end. > > - Jed > > >
