That's not a bad idea. I thought about this, but nagging IH fans is more
entertaining and buys some time for people working with NiH not to be
roasted.

2016-08-20 13:05 GMT-03:00 Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com>:

> In all of this demented nattering over Rossi and IH no one seems to have
> suggested the obvious, that being that the two parties are in cahoots on
> all this. Using the old but perfect advice, 'follow the money', since IH
> has happily used Rossi to take in scores of millions from investors it
> showcased Rossi's year-long demo repeatedly to they surely have been the
> ones receiving the lion's share of the cash in this saga. Nothing makes for
> better cover like the age old drama of the pot calling the kettle black.
> That there is no SEC investigation of the affair and money men is revealing
> and suggests the entire thing is fomented by nefarious producers.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: a.ashfield [mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net]
> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 8:32 AM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Jed's flowmeter comments chanllenged.
>
> Jed,
> AA  At this point I don't have a lot of sympathy for IH.  They have had a
> year with access to the plant to figure this out and yet they wait until
> the test is over and Rossi takes them to court to start complaining?
>
> Jed They were complaining long before that, as you saw in their Answer and
> in Exhibit 5.  You need to stop making stuff up.
>
> If they knew something was wrong, why didn't they DO something about it?
> Exhibit 5 shows the ERV's analysis that indicates the plant was working
> very well.
>
>
>
>


-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com

Reply via email to