a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> If they knew something was wrong, why didn't they DO something about it? > They tried to do something, as you see in the Answer and in Exhibit 5. Rossi refused to let their expert in the door! See Exhibit 19. > Exhibit 5 shows the ERV's analysis that indicates the plant was working > very well. > Good grief! "Working very well" on what planet? The flow meter was the wrong size and only half in the water, so it was giving the wrong answer. The data for flow rates and pressure were blatantly false. The pressure was impossible: "The steam pressure was reported (for the entire period) to be 0 kPaG and the piping is DN40. For steam to flow, a pressure differential is required to overcome the losses in the pipe. Given the foregoing, this would require that the pressure on the JMP side of the building was significantly below atmospheric (vacuum) and that the steam would flow at extraordinary velocity. But this was obviously not the situation present at the location." There was no ventilation equipment except for a broken fan hanging from the ceiling, so there could not possibly be even 100 kW, never mind 1 MW. The data showed 1 MW of constant heat production on days when Rossi, in his blog, reported the machine was half turned off, or fully turned off, and eyewitnesses confirmed this. The arrangement with the "hidden" customer was lunatic, and it obvious the customer was completely fake. And much else was wrong with it??? If this is your idea of "working well" what would be a fiasco? You seem to be disconnected from reality. - Jed
