Making nano and microparticles using aluminum as a substrate requires huge amounts of energy to heat water to near boiling, The leaching process uses 25% and up sodium hydroxide to remove the aluminum to leave the particle nanocavity surface preparation exposed.
Particles need to be leached multiple times to remove all the aluminum. That requires a lot of hot water. That 60C leaching solution would go down the drain. On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > Having an independent customer use the heat and with the customer knowing > how much heat is required to keep his product line running, would have been > a wonderful confirmation that the measurements on the Rossi side of the > wall were correct. Certainly that was the spirit of the contract terms for > the GPT. Making the customer's side secret, and the customer's log of the > heat coming into his factory a secret, certainly looks bad for Rossi and > makes the whole contrived test look like a scam. If I were Rossi (and not > running a scam), I would want that independent customer's validation that I > had delivered the heat - it would make the test incontrovertible. Instead, > so far the opposite has happened - at least until the customer is > subpoenaed to testify in court to the heat consumption of his "factory". > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:25 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> What happened to the heat once it left Rossi's plant is irrelevant to the >> contract. It looks like a desperate effort by IH to discover a problem >> after their hired gun failed to do so. >> It would be like doing a black box experiment and then saying you don't >> believe the measured exit temperature so you are going to measure the main >> drain to see how much it warmed. >> > >
