From memory the flowmeter was DN80, but that was just hearsay. A
dimensioned drwg of the pipework is what's required.
What no comment on Rossi's reply to IH's motion to dismiss? ( Re: [Vo]:
Rossi's answer to IH)
AA
On 9/2/2016 8:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If the steam is condensed it would form a vacuum. DN40 sounds
small to me. Is that another Murray quote?
Yes, I said it was from Murray.
Your knee jerk rejection of this is irrational. You can easily confirm
the size of the pipe by looking up the flowmeter specifications. You
could also think about it for a moment. Ask yourself:
How difficult is it for Murray to measure a pipe?
Murray sent this comment to Penon and Rossi. They did not respond to
this or to any of his other comments, which was a violation of their
contract. They did not respond to the damning facts he brought out,
such as the impossible pressure numbers because they have no answers.
Because they are guilty of blatant fraud. But in addition to the
damning information he cites, suppose he had made a simple error of
fact, such as listing the wrong pipe size. Why wouldn't they correct that?
- Jed
