Jed,
You said the pipe was DN40. There is no way one would put a DN80
flowmeter on a pipe that small. I assume it was mounted on a DM80 pipe
and that was why it was as large as it was.
I depended on memory because I didn't want to take the time to look it
up. Without the piping drawing it is meaningless anyway.
I have translated the legalese of Rossi's response into English in the
link I gave you so you don't have to worry about it..
AA
On 9/3/2016 9:10 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
From memory the flowmeter was DN80, but that was just hearsay.
Why do you depend on memory? It is right there in Exhibit 5. The
flowmeter was an Apator PoWoGaz, model number MWN130-80-NC. That is
not "hearsay." It is a statement filed with the court by I.H. If it is
wrong, there will be dire consequences for I.H., possibly the loss of
millions of dollars, so you can be sure it is right.
You seem to think you are free to redefine the word "hearsay" to mean
whatever you want it to mean.
What no comment on Rossi's reply to IH's motion to dismiss? ( Re:
[Vo]: Rossi's answer to IH)
It was just filed! I.H. has not had time to comment. I cannot
understand the legal gobbledygook in that statement so I have no comment.
- Jed
