a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: >From memory the flowmeter was DN80, but that was just hearsay. >
Why do you depend on memory? It is right there in Exhibit 5. The flowmeter was an Apator PoWoGaz, model number MWN130-80-NC. That is not "hearsay." It is a statement filed with the court by I.H. If it is wrong, there will be dire consequences for I.H., possibly the loss of millions of dollars, so you can be sure it is right. You seem to think you are free to redefine the word "hearsay" to mean whatever you want it to mean. > What no comment on Rossi's reply to IH's motion to dismiss? ( Re: [Vo]: > Rossi's answer to IH) > It was just filed! I.H. has not had time to comment. I cannot understand the legal gobbledygook in that statement so I have no comment. - Jed
