Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote:
> you ignore with easiness the reproducibility problem > I did not ignore it. I stated clearly that this is predicated on controlling the reaction. I said "Assumption. With Pd-D 200 W/g can be achieved, at any desired temperature up to the melting point of Pd." If that cannot be done, Pd-D cannot be commercialized. > Cna you tell me the rtae of success NOW say at > SKINR, ENEA, Coolescence and others? > These places have not succeeded. That is why there are no commercial cold fusion devices. No one can control Ti or Ni cold fusion either. Rossi claims that he can, but that is not true. If he could, he would not have put fake data in the spreadsheets, and I.H. would have paid him $89 million. > Re the ERv report it has 600000 pages . . . > I do not think so. > , you have seen 352 daily reports > not 8448 hourly ones and not the results for 506880 minutes (approx) > I do not think there are any hourly reports, but if there are, and if they agree with the daily reports, they are also fake. You cannot have a daily summary showing fake data which is based on hourly data that is real. The hourly data would have to show pressure of 0.0 bar, which is impossible, and it would have to show temperatures that average (or peak) at the exact same temperature to the nearest tenth degree every day for weeks. That's impossible. It is preposterous. - Jed
