Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote:
> Your last variant re Rossi's fake data was this; Exactly zero excess heat, > watermeter lying 4 Times more flow 103 C fluid water not trace of steam. > At 4 atm 103°C water is liquid without a trace of steam. 4 atm is not much. The back pressure from the radiator was more than this. If Rossi has valid data showing real excess heat, why did he publish nonsense fake data showing he is a crude fraud? And why didn't he demonstrate this heat to I.H. during the year he worked in North Carolina. They would have paid him $89 million. Rossi's own data, that he uploaded in this court case, proves he is a fraud. That's all there is to it. - Jed
