Ken Shoulders misunderstood the nature of the EVO. The EVO is a cluster of polaritons. The optical cavity contains photons that are confined inside the cavity and orbit inside its. These photons are ENTANGLED with electrons of the same energy that are in dipole motion on the surface of the metal. Entanglement is not sensitive or care about position in space so the light and electrons can be in different places but still connected.
Because the polaritons are bosons, they can accumulating in extreme densities in a bose condinsate with their collective spins oriented axially out of BOTH the north and south pole of the optical cavity. The photons obit in both directions to produce the dual axial spins. https://phys.org/news/2017-01-physicists-spontaneous-symmetry-optical-microcavity.html Physicists have observed spontaneous symmetry breaking in an optical microcavity, they have demonstrated experimentally the emergence of spontaneous symmetry breaking <https://phys.org/tags/spontaneous+symmetry+breaking/> in an ultrahigh-Q whispering-gallery microresonator. The Optical whispering gallery (WGW) microcavity is the structural form that the Surface Plasmon Polariton BEC assumed in LENR. . These whispering gallery modes <https://phys.org/tags/whispering+gallery+modes/> are analogous to the acoustic resonances in the whispering gallery in St. Paul Cathedral in London. A critical clue to the role of symmetry breaking in LENR is the observation that the application of an electrostatic field catalyzes spontaneous symmetry breaking in the WGW via the Kerr effect. [image: 1-physicistsob.jpg] The application of an very high voltage * electrostatic* field has been listed as a trigger of the LENR reaction in Rossi's patent. When this electrostatic field is applied, the WGW produces symmetry breaking which induces a energy transfer between a proton and a simultaneous decay in that proton via a symmetry breaking based entangled interface. The Kerr effect converts the optical cavity into a polariton based monopole produced when all the polaritons orbit in the same direction. On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Nigel Dyer wrote: > > I have been musing about spin and Leonard Susskinds lectures and books >> have got me thinking in a slightly different way: There is very much LENR >> related, but I will start with a 'simple' question .... In the Stern >> Gerlach experiment the act of 'measuring' the spin of the particle has an >> effect on the spin, in that the information about the spin in the >> non-measured axis has been destroyed... >> > > Not only has the "information" been destroyed but in addition, the actual > property itself can be destroyed or at least divorced/nullified. Here is an > older article that helps to explain a feature of electrons, which is often > ignored. > > https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090730141607.htm > > As for a LENR connection: Electrons can be modeled as having three > separate components: spin, charge and orbit. Electrons in solids under > self-compression (such as dense hydrogen) are actually able to split-off > and nullify one or two of these components in a process called spin–charge > separation. In the case of UDH the lost property is orbit but it can be > charge or spin in other circumstances. > > This weird phenomenon normally only happens close to absolute zero ... and > LENR - at least the Holmlid variety - could represent the case where > properties are separated at higher temperature under laser compression. (or > else laser cooling has lowed the effective temperature to near zero). Wiki > has an entry on spin-charge separation. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin%E2%80%93charge_separation > > The late Ken Shoulders was able to produce and document pulses of bound > electrons he called EVOs in which the charge component was effectively > separated in order to allow "charge clusters" to form despite mutual > repulsion. This was a small scale version of so-called "ball lightning". > Here is an article on Ken. > > http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue61/chargeclusters.html > > > >
