Bob
I followed up the lead to Phillip Hatt's ideas. I find these various
grand unified ideas that individuals have put together fascinating. I
encountered one myself many years ago which I posted up on my website
and I think mentioned on vortex-l some years ago
http://thedyers.org.uk/nigel/alfred-claude-jessup/
I suspect that a lot could be learnt by soing a careful study of all of
these ideas and attempt some kind of meta synthesis. There must be a
genetic component to this in that my son has come up with his own GUT of
a kind, but unfortunately it has got stuck in a pre-publication loop.
When it has managed to leave the loop, vortex-l will be one of the first
places to know. What it does do is show the very clear relationship
between the fundemental particles, quarks, electrons and neutrinos and
certainly leaves me in no doubts of the reality of quarks.
Nigel
On 28/05/2017 18:59, [email protected] wrote:
Nigel—
Philippe Hatt’s theory of the composition and parameters of neutrons
and protons—charge, mass and magnetic moment---as a system of positons
and electrons is instructive. His predictions of these parameters is
“dead nuts on” with respect to existing experimental accuracy. (No
quarks involved or other virtual particles, only real particles.)
Bob Cook
