Measuring magnetic susceptibility is what led to bosenovas. >From upthread:
It is hard to form a stable BEC of more than 100 atoms, and seeing what's going on in condensates so small is very difficult. The recent discovery of a particular mode in rubidium-85 called a 'Feshbach resonance' increased the maximum condensate size to several tens of thousands of atoms -- but only at just two billionths of a degree above absolute zero. "Damn cold by anyone's standards," as Wieman says. Nonetheless, the new technique gave researchers a tool rather like a pair of *magnetic pliers* to manipulate the condensates. Their results have them scratching their heads. When compressed quickly enough, a condensate explodes, blasting off the outer atoms and leaving a cold, collapsed remnant. The effect has been dubbed a 'bosenova' because of its similarity to a supernova (an exploding star). On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:05 PM, CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bob, you got me to thinking how to measure any changes in spin > coupling or the how to detect a BEC in solid and so I began to wonder if > measuring magnetic susceptibility in PdH and PdD would show anything. I > found an interesting old paper by H C Jamieson and F D Manchester "The > magnetic susceptibility of Pd, PdH and PdD between 4 and 300 K" 1972 J. > Phys. F: Met. Phys. 2 323 http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4608/2/2/023. > > This was from back in the 70s so take it as you may. What I found > interesting is in the beta phase of Pd (H) was tending to be diamagnetic > (repels) and nearly independent of temperature. That would seem to > indicate that the H are becoming spin aligned and could hint at the > formation of a BEC system. I also see a trend that D is also heading > towards diamagenetic (negative susceptibility) with increasing D loading. > > So does someone have a newer paper on the subject? > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:37 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < > bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> CD Sites— >> >> >> >> I have for some time been of the mind that nuclear potential energy tied >> up in a lattice of coherent (entangled) particles is transfered to the >> lattice electrons in the form of spin orbital momentum—phonic energy during >> LENR. >> >> >> >> In the Pd system with D at high loading a small BEC of D nuclei could >> form and then fuse to He g iven the correct conditions involving EM >> coupling to link neutron and proton magnetic moments with magnetic moments >> of the Pd lattice electrons. In this regard I consider it takes a >> relatively strong local B field to accomplish the necessary coupling with >> the neutron and proton making up a D nucleus. >> >> >> >> The BEC status of D’s within the lattice would allow their close approach >> during a reaction forming a He nucleus. The potential energy released >> would not result in energetic particles or EM radiation, but only phonic >> (spin) energy spread across the entire lattice. >> >> >> >> With proper resonant coupling and many BEC within a single lattice a >> larger, more energetic, reaction occurs releasing enough phonic energy to >> destroy the lattice or to create a bosenova. >> >> >> >> The reactions suggested above seem to fit observations from Pd system >> LENR testing IMHO. >> >> >> >> Bob Cook. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> >> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 13, 2017 3:49 PM >> *To: *vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature >> >> >> >> I'm kind of late on this, but would spin conservation do what Ed Storm >> asked? >> >> >> >> "However, why would only a few hydrons fuse leaving just enough unreacted >> hydrons available to carry all the energy without it producing >> >> energetic radiation? I would expect occasionally,many hydrons would fuse >> leaving too few unreacted hydrons so that the dissipated energy >> >> would have to be very energetic and easily detected." >> >> >> >> If I remember, Steve and Talbot Chubbs had proposed that bose band >> states could distribute the energy over many nucleons >> >> in the band state. In a 1D kronig-penny model of a periodic potential, H >> and D form bands and their band energy levels are separated by a >> >> 0.2eV, which means when 20MeV is spread across the band, the spectrum >> would be 20MeV / (n * 0.2eV) where n are the number of hyrons >> >> making up the band. That's just back of the envelope using a 2D >> kronig-penny period potential. And all of that photon energy spread over >> >> n-hydrons gets dumped right back into the lattice. Similar in a sense to >> the Mossbauer effect. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2017/jun/12/superfl >> uid-polaritons-seen-at-room-temperature >> >> >> Superfluid polaritons seen at room temperature >> >> >> >> the polaritons behave like a fluid that can flow without friction around >> obstacles, which were formed by using a laser to burn small holes in the >> organic material. This is interpreted by the researchers as being a >> signature of the superfluid behaviour. >> >> >> >> there might be some sort of link between a superfluid and a Bose–Einstein >> condensate (BEC) – the latter being a state of matter in which all >> constituent particles have condensed into a single quantum state. He was >> proved right in 1995 when superfluidity was observed in BECs made from >> ultracold atoms >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> A Bose condinsate brings super radiance and super absorption into play. >> These mechanisms produce concentration, storage, and amplification of low >> level energy and goes as "N", the number of items in the condinsate. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Frank Znidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com> >> wrote: >> >> Why is a Bose Condensate needed? Its a matter of size and energy. The >> smaller the size of something we want to see the more energy it takes. >> Using low energy radar you will never be able to read something as small as >> this text. You need to go to UV energies to study atoms. Higher ionizing >> energies are needed to study the nuclear forces. Really high energy >> accelerator energies are required to look at subatomic particles. >> >> >> >> The common complaint physicists have with cold fusion is that the energy >> levels are to low to induce any type of nuclear reaction. They never, >> however, considered the energy levels of a large hundreds of atoms wide >> condensed nano-particle. Its energy levels are quite low. Warm thermal >> vibrations appear to the nano particle as a high energy excitation. This >> again is a matter of its size. It's not cracks, or shrunken atoms at >> work. It is the thermal excitation of a nano particle that yields the >> required energy. >> >> >> >> Again the simulation induces a velocity of one million meters per second. >> >> >> >> Frank Z >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
