which is sad, because Galileo's physics led to the idea of point-particle;
which many people rebel against such an existential crisis in physics
Introduction to Boscovich talk by Stoiljkovich + existential crisis in physics
R Anderton ANPA 2016
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Introduction to Boscovich talk by Stoiljkovich + existential crisis in phys...
Copernician Revolution led to Existential crisis, the fall-out of which we
still suffer. Boscovich's theory ... | |
|
|
On Monday, 3 July 2017, 18:05, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
My reply accidentally went to Roger's personal email address.
Eric
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi v. Darden
To: ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com>
Hi Roger,
If Galileo directed repeated, charged personal attacks with crass language at
valued participants on LENR Forum, he might not have lasted long. I don't know
what his personality was like, and I suspect he just made claims that people
didn't want to here [hear]. But if he was pugnacious in the sense of changing
the conversation from a debate to simple personal attacks, the world would have
had to benefit from his knowledge and insight through some channel other than
LENR Forum.
Eric
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:47 PM, ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
>>We would ideally not attract pugnacious participants
Galileo was pugnacious
On Monday, 3 July 2017, 16:11, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Kevin,
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
You have a perception of someone who claims to be a lawyer who has missed at
least 2 major aspects of the law with respect to this case. You have a
one-sided perception. HE WAS THE ONE WHO STARTED THE INSULTS. But you put ME
on probation. That says volumes about your moderating ability.
In your pugnacious attacks, you will drive away informed participants such as
woodworker. woodworker's slights were subtle. Your retorts were crass and
sought to escalate the matter. Hopefully the distinction is apparent to you.
Informed participants with relevant experience are the people we seek to
attract. We would ideally not attract pugnacious participants such as
yourself, but there's only so much we can do.
You say I was given a request on a side thread, and then a warning AFTER I WAS
PUT ON PROBATION. Your approach is completely screwed up.
Yes, point conceded. Better recollecting what I had in mind when I said you
were on "probation" (not something that has not been formalized at LENR Forum),
you were basically put in the category of participants such as Sifferkoll the
minute I saw that you were on the attack. I've seen you in action on Vortex,
so your reputation proceeded you.
I'm going to disengage in this discussion with you about moderation at LENR
Forum at this point and allow you the last word.
Eric
