On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > According to Abd... "All claims dropped on both sides. It is as if the > suit was never filed. > > The IP and license are not mentioned. As Rossi was apparently pleased I > deduce something has changed in the ownership of the IP or the multi > country license. > As IH claimed the above were valueless it would be hard for them to object > to them reverting to Rossi. It was rumored that Rossi actually offered to > buy them back earlier. > If either the E-Cat or QuarkX work, this would be worth more than the $89 > million. > > I know you and others have made up your minds that Rossi never had > anything that worked, but I find that conclusion premature. If either work > he may get the last laugh. > This myopic, narrow obsession with 'Intellectual Property' is the WHOLE reason why this entire process has failed -- assuming cold fusion is a material reality, in its own right. But that is at _least_ as much Andrea Rossi's egotistical, money-grubbing fault, as anyone's.