I use outlook for e-mails.How do you block certain senders?
________________________________ From: Che <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fission may be the best fit for future LENR On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Nuclear fission has a lot of critics, and rightly so ... but all of the problems of fission derive from trying to control a multi-ton critical mass of explosively enriched U in a steam pressurized reactor. Even with that major design problem, the French have demonstrated to the rest of the World that fission can make economic sense. Even with Fukushima still smoldering, we must consider that an improved version of nuclear fission can make great economic sense. This is especially true for countries without much oil. When the electric car goes into mass production at lower cost (soon) off-peak recharging is a feature which makes fission more economically viable in the 'big picture'. A "new and improved" version of fission means ditching enrichment, going subcritical, going small and modular and with direct conversion of heat to electricity. It is easily possible that fission can be made preferable to hot fusion in every way, and less costly than any other option including coal and cold fusion, if Pd is required. I hear they're getting energy out of windmills and solar panels too, these days.
