I use outlook for e-mails.How do you block certain senders?

From: Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:40 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fission may be the best fit for future LENR

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Jones Beene 
<jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote:
Nuclear fission has a lot of critics, and rightly so ... but all of the 
problems of fission derive from trying to control a multi-ton critical mass of 
explosively enriched U in a steam pressurized reactor. Even with that major 
design problem, the French have demonstrated to the rest of the World that 
fission can make economic sense.

Even with Fukushima still smoldering, we must consider that an improved version 
of nuclear fission can make great economic sense. This is especially true for 
countries without much oil. When the electric car goes into mass production at 
lower cost (soon) off-peak recharging is a feature which makes fission more 
economically viable in the 'big picture'.

A "new and improved" version of fission means ditching enrichment, going 
subcritical, going small and modular and with direct conversion of heat to 
electricity. It is easily possible that fission can be made preferable to hot 
fusion in every way, and less costly than any other option including coal and 
cold fusion, if Pd is required.

I hear they're getting energy out of windmills and solar panels too, these days.

Reply via email to