The folks on Vortex-l that in the past have suggested Rossi was a fraud etc must be busy eating crow based on the significant silence of their anti-Rossi claque.
Bob Cook From: Che<mailto:comandantegri...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 7:58 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won' This has likely already been pointed out here -- but I'll point it out now (again), if it hasn't. Here’s The Settlement—Getting The License Back Was Rossi’s Top Priority<https://animpossibleinvention.com/2017/07/18/heres-the-settlement-getting-the-license-back-was-rossis-top-priority/> The bottom line appears to be that IH 'settled' -- because they simply could not *prove* fraud (which perhaps, never actually took place -- at least the way IH sees it). Simple as that. So they would have _lost_ the case if it had gone to trial -- and been liable for whatever _they_ would have been liable for. Rossi OTOH, strategically forewent the money he was 'owed': because he valued the IP over everything else -- and is smart enuff to know when to 'fold' and walk away. Is that it, or close enuff..?
