The folks on Vortex-l that in the past have suggested Rossi was a fraud etc
must be busy eating crow based on the significant silence of their anti-Rossi
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 7:58 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'
This has likely already been pointed out here -- but I'll point it out now
(again), if it hasn't.
Here’s The Settlement—Getting The License Back Was Rossi’s Top
The bottom line appears to be that IH 'settled' -- because they simply could
not *prove* fraud (which perhaps, never actually took place -- at least the way
IH sees it). Simple as that. So they would have _lost_ the case if it had gone
to trial -- and been liable for whatever _they_ would have been liable for.
Rossi OTOH, strategically forewent the money he was 'owed': because he valued
the IP over everything else -- and is smart enuff to know when to 'fold' and
Is that it, or close enuff..?