It is not difficult to find funding if you have results. Vinod Khosla, a Forbes
billionaire and successful venture capitalist, says that he actually looks for
disruptive technology as his main parameter. Of course, it must work, as the
Rossi is a scam artist who deserves no credit. In fact he is most fortunate not
to have been prosecuted for false filings under oath - in US Federal Court -
concerning the fraudulent JM shell company. According to IH, this and parts of
his deposition constituted criminal perjury - and he is not in the clear on
that yet, nor is his attorney. They may be thinking the bad-weather gods for
As for Etiam – they did raise R&D money in Finland and built a prototype, but
apparently this device could not perform as hoped, and the funding was dropped.
Same with CoolEssence.
Had Rossi been able to prove in court that he had anything valuable at all in
the way of positive results - then more than likely, Etiam and CoolEssence
could have been in line for more R&D funding despite their failures … but
essentially, what has happened to many researchers is that Rossi has
essentially “poisoned the well.”
Very little funding for LENR is out there now. That is why Mizuno is seen as
somewhat of a savior for the field. Maybe Khosla will have a look – if and when
Mizuno is replicated.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Adrian Ashfield
"On the other hand, it never fails to amaze us how difficult it is to find
funding for the development of disruptive technology"
But rather than credit Rossi with finding funding you blame him for others
failing to do so.
BTW – here is Etiam’s patent filing, present status unknown due to the
It mentions both Rossi and Holmlid but is a different take.
There could be value there.