did anyone notice Anthropocene Institute no more talk of LENR
and that lenararies memo disappeared?

beside that there is earlier casualties of the Doral fiasco, some who could
but have not been funded waiting for the trial to end positively.

2017-09-09 21:38 GMT+02:00 JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net>:

> It is not difficult to find funding if you have results. Vinod Khosla, a
> Forbes billionaire and successful venture capitalist, says that he actually
> looks for disruptive technology as his main parameter. Of course, it must
> work, as the primary ingredient.
>
>
>
> Rossi is a scam artist who deserves no credit. In fact he is most
> fortunate not to have been prosecuted for false filings under oath - in US
> Federal Court - concerning the fraudulent JM shell company. According to
> IH, this and parts of his deposition constituted criminal perjury - and he
> is not in the clear on that yet, nor is his attorney. They may be thinking
> the bad-weather gods for Irma.
>
>
>
> As for Etiam – they did raise R&D money in Finland and built a prototype,
> but apparently this device could not perform as hoped, and the funding was
> dropped. Same with CoolEssence.
>
>
>
> Had Rossi been able to prove in court that he had anything valuable at all
> in the way of positive results - then more than likely, Etiam and
> CoolEssence could have been in line for more R&D funding despite their
> failures … but essentially, what has happened to many researchers is that
> Rossi has essentially “poisoned the well.”
>
>
>
> Very little funding for LENR is out there now. That is why Mizuno is seen
> as somewhat of a savior for the field. Maybe Khosla will have a look – if
> and when Mizuno is replicated.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
> *From: *Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
>
>
>
> "On the other hand, it never fails to amaze us how difficult it is to find
> funding for the development of disruptive technology"
>
> But rather than credit Rossi with finding funding you blame him for others
> failing to do so.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JonesBeene
>
> http://ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it/2017/09/08/fuf-rip/
>
>
>
> BTW – here is Etiam’s patent filing, present status unknown due to the
> company’s demise.
>
>
>
> https://www.google.com/patents/US20150162104
>
>
>
> It mentions both Rossi and Holmlid but is a different take.
>
>
>
> There could be value there.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to