What do you think about Mikes theory of quantized inertia (QI)? And what about
his use of QI to explain galactic mechanics without dark matter? Does the
emdrive mistake void the concept of QI?
(The Ted talk has been deleted from youtube apparently.
From: Bob Higgins<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 5:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter and
explains the EM drive
I have read McCulloch's book. His proposition fails in causality. Filters do
not form with a filled state, they have a finite impulse response that he
hadn't addressed when I asked him about it.
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:25 AM, Russ
Here’s Mike McCulloch’s TedX talk last Thursday. It is remarkable work.
Mike is what one might call as ‘armchair physics anti-matter’ as he annihilates
the fiction of dark matter with straight forward math and real data,
eliminating the dark matter fudge that has made a sticky mess of science for a