Axil— What does the lack of magnetic moment have to due with the isotopic mass spec data likelihood?
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2018 1:51:30 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR fission * * IF SAFIRE looked into the titanium isotopes that was generated by transmutation, they would see that it is mostly Ti47 and Ti49 because those isotopes have a large magnetic moment. Table. Stables isotopes of titanium<https://www.webelements.com/periodicity/isotopes/>. Isotope Mass /Da Natural abund. (atom %) Nuclear spin (I) Nuclear magnetic moment (μ/μN) 46Ti 45.9526294 (14) 8.25 (3) 0 47Ti 46.9517640 (11) 7.44 (2) 5/2 -0.78848 48Ti 47.9479473 (11) 73.72 (3) 0 49Ti 48.9478711 (11) 5.41 (2) 7/2 -1.10417 50Ti 49.9447921 (12) 5.18 (2) 0 * Edit<https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5558-lenr-is-occurring-in-safire/?postID=82269#> * <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5558-lenr-is-occurring-in-safire/?postID=82269#> * <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5558-lenr-is-occurring-in-safire/?postID=82269#> * * <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5558-lenr-is-occurring-in-safire/?pageNo=1> * On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 4:20 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: One of the key features of a sucessful LENR reactor design is the high efficiency conversion of LENR energy into heat. Most of the energy that is produced by the LENR reaction is formatted as subatomic particle creation. It is important in a successful LENR reaction design to capture those particles and convert them to heat energy. One method that might do this conversion is a magnetic bottle using a quadruple or another charged particle confining magnetic field. The muons that come out of the LENR reaction must be confined inside the reactor for up to 10 microseconds to give them enough time to decay. This decay will convert most of the mass of the muon ( 105.6583745(24) MeV/c2 )into heat energy and electrons. [cid:ii_jevtb9tx0_162359acc47de1f3] On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The COP of the Brillouin reactor is now been verified to be under 1.5... nearly useless. If I remember correctly, MFMP produced over unity heat in some of their experiments but not very much. The same low COP issue arose in the Lugano demo. Low COP is a big problem for LENR. Most of the energy produced by LENR comes in the form of sub atomic particle generation which includes huge numbers of neutrinos. In the LENR reaction, the heat is provided by a minor energy channel involving hawking radiation. The Brillouin reactor is most likely pumping out a ton of sub atomic particles as seen in the experiments of Holmlid. Those particles need to be converted to heat. Therefore, the heat rich LENR reactor should be surrounded by a blanket of molten lead or thorium salt to capture muons that will catalyze muon fission. But this type of fission will produce a ton of neutrons similar to a hot fusion reactor. The dream of a LENR reactor in your basement might well be impossible unless Rossi has found a way to increase the proportion of the reaction energy to be radiated in the form of heat. To verify if this opinion is well founded, a LENR reactor should be surrounded in lead blocks up to a foot thick. We should see a large flux of neutrons produced by the lead.
