Google:"muon induced fission" On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:42 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote:
> Axil— > > > > I the don’t know the mechanism to “canalize fission reactions”. Can > you give a reference? > > > > Bob Cook > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, May 4, 2018 11:47:56 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons > > Muons will get through all of that light material with no problem. But > muons will be captured by the iron body of a pancake detector. The muon can > then canalize fission reactions in the iron and the gas in the pancake > detector will register radiation generated by the fission reaction. > > If you place some more iron or lead between the experiment and the > detector head, and the counts go up.. then you are seeing muons. > > On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 2:10 AM, Russ <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This gets into the age old ‘lumper’ vs. ‘splitter’ academic game. Sure >> some Geigers can see betas. In my experiments the emissions have to make it >> through a gauntlet of materials, mm thick ceramic, many mm thick quartz, >> fire brick, and of course plenty of air before they reach the front face of >> the Geiger. Since of course no one but an armchair idiot would trust only >> one Geiger and would not test various inserted attenuating materials and >> metals it is not really ‘lumping’ to declare that in this case Geigers >> cannot detect betas.’ >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Saturday, May 5, 2018 1:07 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Meshugganons >> >> >> >> Russ George suggested that Geiger tubes do not record betas. >> >> >> >> I would guess that high energy betas (depending upon the window >> composition) should be recorded by Geiger tubes. Russ’s beta sources that >> he used to check his tubes may have produced only soft betas. >> >> >> >> Maybe Russ could identify the energy of his beta sources. >> >> >> >> Bob Cook >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Bob Higgins <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, May 4, 2018 4:28:40 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons >> >> >> >> When Ed Storms reported on this, he had more than one pancake tube. One >> had a mica window and the other two were plastic. I believe he said that >> the "strange radiation" he encountered activated something in the mica >> window. The tube with the mica window became activated and had a >> particular decay rate that he measured. He could bring the other, plastic >> window'ed tubes close to the mica window and they would detect emissions >> from it. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:33 AM, Russ <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We have three identical Geiger’s that I switch positions to constantly >> challenge (and eliminate) any anomalous behaviour and to reveal glitches as >> well as to provide coincident background counts that are used to refine the >> precision of the background vs. hot counts. The high count rates can be >> intentionally produced and reduced with prescribed changes in the >> experiment. So far so good. Of course this must be repeated with ever more >> precision and care, an effort in process at this moment. >> >> >> >> *From:* John Berry <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2018 11:38 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons >> >> >> >> Is there any difference when the tube, shielding and Geiger counter are >> vertically disposed as in the image, or horizontally? >> >> >> >> How can you be sure it isn't some capacitive coupling effect? >> >> Could you ground the shields? >> >> Could you apply voltage spikes to the plates without them being exposed >> to the spark gap directly, see if that triggers the Geiger? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Russ <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Nonsense there is no such lead shielding on the experiment as suggested. >> >> >> >> As well I have been interchanging 3 independent Geiger counters to >> eliminate any one being seen as being influenced by stray electrical >> fields. Only the Geiger that is nearest to the experimental source shows >> the anomalous count at multiples of the background. >> >> >> >> Much more work needs to be done to eliminate any and all possible errors >> in this but at least the anomalous emissions are predictably able to be >> induced in a repeatable fashion. In my opinion these emissions might well >> be either gammas or something unusual. The Geigers have been challenged >> with known beta sources and are quite unable to count betas. >> >> >> >> They are not behaving like my previous discovery of Mischugenons, I have >> recently renamed these ‘Tellerons’ in honour of my colleague Edward Teller >> who helped me with that discovery and indeed had speculated on their >> existence decades before my discovery experiments. >> >> >> >> There are clear paths to improve and enhance this Androcles protocol that >> will bring it in line with the work and teachings of Mills, Rossi, and >> Piantelli. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Sunday, April 15, 2018 8:00 PM >> *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons >> >> >> >> In Alan's experiment, the Geiger counter's activity is the function of >> the thickness of the lead shielding. No shielding creates no Geiger >> counter activity. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Brian Ahern <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Geiger counters are notoriously prone to high voltage noise interference. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Sunday, April 15, 2018 2:15 PM >> *To:* vortex-l >> *Subject:* [Vo]:Meshugganons >> >> >> >> · >> New >> >> · >> >> · #54 >> <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/2461-new-energy-world-symposium-in-stockholm-on-june-18-2018/?postID=84069#post84069>[image: >> 4766-the-test-png] >> >> >> >> Regarding Alan glow tube test... >> >> >> THUNDER ENERGIES, <http://www.thunder-energies.com/>a company that >> uses DR. RUGGERO SANTILLI'S TECH to detect nuclear weapons in sealed >> containers uses a variant of Alan Smith's experiment. >> >> >> >> http://www.thunder-energies.co…11-articles/19-article-10 >> <http://www.thunder-energies.com/index.php/ct-menu-item-18/11-articles/19-article-10> >> >> >> >> Quote >> >> *The hadronic reactors for the industrial synthesis of thermal neutrons >> from a hydrogen gas essentially include (TEC international patent pending):* >> >> *1. A metal vessel filled up with a hydrogen gas at a pressure depending >> on the desired neutron CPS;* >> >> *2. Electronic means for the remote control of the gap between a pair of >> tungsten electrodes located inside said metal vessel; and* >> >> >> >> *3. A specially designed power unit delivering high voltage and high >> current rapid DC discharges in between said electrodes.* >> >> *As shown in Figure 5, the DC arc ionizes the hydrogen atoms, thus >> creating a plasma of protons and electrons; the DC arc then aligns the >> proton and the electron along a magnetic field line with the appropriate >> spin and other couplings; an engineering means called triggers compress the >> electron inside the proton, by supplying the missing energy (which is about >> one million electron Volts, 1 MeV).* >> >> *Display More* >> >> >> >> Sometimes a theorist can save an experimenter a lot of work by avoiding >> duplicating existing technology. >> >> >> >> >> >> Santilli thinks that neutrons can be formed out of a union of protons and >> neutrons. This is nonsense. What Santilli is producing are muons. the same >> particle that Alan is generating. The US government is using cosmic ray >> generated muons to detect nuclear material in shipping containers now. >> >> >> Cosmic-Ray Muons Reveal Hidden Void in the Great Pyramid >> http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/n…oid-in-the-great-pyramid/ >> <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/ancient/cosmic-ray-muons-reveal-hidden-void-in-the-great-pyramid/> >> >> >> >> >> >> Muon Thomography are well known as a means to detect nuclear material >> >> >> >> Innovations In Nuclear Detection: Muon Tomography >> >> http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2012/ph241/khan1/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
