On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 5:32 PM Remi Cornwall <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi > > > > As part of the EMPropulsion project, I had to set about justifying why > Quantum Field Theorists calculate a massive zero-point energy (10111J/m3) > and yet Astronomers/Cosmologists using General Relativity measure a vacuum > energy of only 10-9J/m3. > > > > This cosmological constant problem of some 10120 is one of the biggest > problems in physics. I think there is a way around this where rather than > put the calculated quantum vacuum energy density directly into the > stress-energy tensor, we introduce it as a third order perturbation. > > > > I discuss it here: http://vixra.org/abs/1901.0143 > > > > And this is part of a post I wrote to a fellow academic:- > The imbalance relates to the maximum amount of energy available in the vacuum compared to the efficiency of vacuum energy extraction produced by long lived gravity based black holes. These huge gravity based black holes are poor at extracting energy from the vacuum through hawking radiation. Few people understand how hawking radiation actually works with regard to vacuum energy extraction. The most efficient black holes are the micro black holes with extremely short life times. Polariton condensates produce these analog EMF based black holes. This is very complicated and difficult stuff due to the complications that general relativity imposes on the event horizon. But according to Dr. Paul M. Sutter, all particle and photon based hawking radiation is predetermined at the instant of black hole creation. This is the result of time dilation at or near the event horizon. Like a scoop of ice cream with sprinkles on its surface, as the ice cream melts over time, the sprinkles are freed from the surface and move away from that surface. The time that this release happens is a function of the position of the sprinkles at or near the surface when the ice cream scoop first forms. This is why small black holes radiate with much more intensity than big ones do since time dilation is less intense at the time of small hole formation as compared to large hole formation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1JLCxoi4GI Believe it or not, the hutchison effect is a form of LENR that produces anti gravity on the surface of objects through the use of polarized RF. The polariton condensate has been shown to produce negative mass/energy. https://www.sciencealert.com/negative-mass-quasi-particle-polaritons-low-energy-lasers Physicists Say They've Created a Device That Generates 'Negative Mass' This effect is actually anti gravity produced by polaritons as they extract energy from the vacuum. . Polaritons are actually extremely short lived EMF analog black holes that extract energy from the vacuum through hawking radiation. > > > > The second paper was just trying to reconcile it with the cosmological > vacuum energy that *astronomers see* – it’s begging the question if it’s > real or not. I intend to engineer with some phenomena, so I have to make > sure the phenomenon exists. I say that it is but it doesn’t go directly > into the EFE where it would have a big effect (understatement) but as an > higher order correction effect and the *numbers come out about right*. In > fact, I think the 10120 gulf between what quantum mechanics *predicts* > and what *astronomers see* should be *bigger* – more like 10129 > > > > then pvac(observed) = (G/c4)3pvac(calculated) > > > > and that may indicate more degrees of freedom/extra dimensions (more > harmonic oscillators with 1/2hf zpe) that the String Theorists have been > going on about for years. I am bouncing this off a few people. If the ideas > are correct, it might be a nifty result giving some credence to ST, which > has been a bit of mathematical exercise (apart from AdS/CFT which is a bit > like Gauss’ Law/Stoke’s Law, so largely applied maths). > > > > Remi. > > >
