I agree with Terry that there is no known reason in physics for this device to work.
And… there are lots of reasons including centuries of experience as witnessed in a litany of failed attempts - for this kind of device not to work. Curiously, Terry was involved in a magmo project which was arguably related to this one in that it involved a large very mass of very strong magnets. In both cases, if the experimental device had indeed worked - and thereby violated the LoT (big IF) then… at its most fundamental basis… there would have been some kind of “super-size it” effect which converts disorder into order on a sufficient scale to pass athermodynamic tipping point … or so the argument goes. Such a hypothetical negentropy effect - in the most general terms, would somehow employ magnetic precession and unbalanced field effects as an ordering principle. The LoT can be viewed as the overriding force for disorder (randomness) in nature and the magnetic field itself creates some amount of order out of disorder. But so far in human history – no one has been able to overcome this tendency for disorder by simply scaling up to a larger mass of ordered material. Nevertheless, I predict that humans will keep on trying to “supersize it” – even is Dennis Danzik adds his name to a long list of failures… Several tons of ordered mass may not work - but next time someone (with disdain for “laws”) will try to assemble several tens of tons 😊 From: Terry Blanton Subject: Re: [Vo]:Article on Dennis Danzik - Inventor of EarthEngine (magmo) Pulse driven flywheels. They have a big yellow battery driving them. See Bedini. The magnetic cycle is conservative.
