Unluckily charge is only known for the electron. The charge inside a
nucleus is given by a topological relation between waves. Charge is a
function of rotating mass. Thus your idea is to simple for next
generation of physics models.
J.W.
Am 30.08.19 um 21:45 schrieb mix...@bigpond.com:
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:59:28 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
First a small theoretical update.
A proton consists of a 2x2 core relativistic wave structure that couples
with a three wave excess-energy flux part and a two wave charge
structure. In SO(4) we have a 5 rotation structure where core mass only
can have 4 and charge has 5. This model is highly accurate and allows
e.g. to calculate nuclear properties like e.g. the magnetic moment of
Deuterium and of course it's exact mass.
From an energy point of view it is completely impossible that adding an
electron to a proton will ever generate an anti proton because you would
need to completely inverse the flow of all magnetic mass. In the
electron case the annihilation is straight forward because the external
visible orbits do match in shape and energy! But a proton and electron
never match.
1) The energy of a ( positron + anti-proton ) = ( electron + proton ), thus from
an energy standpoint there is no problem.
2) They don't need to match, because we are not talking about annihilation, we
are talking about a charge exchange mechanism, where the proton becomes
negative, and the electron positive, i.e. electron -> positron & proton ->
anti-proton.
3) Annihilation occurs when the newly formed anti-proton meets another normal
proton, where the structures do match. (Ditto for the positron.)
Taking this into consideration, please have another go at explaining why it's
impossible. Note that I think you may be right, but would like to understand the
real reason why.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
