The posts above have been revised, combined, and reformatted as follows: What the Holmlid reaction shows is the naked transmutation process. This naked transmutation process is not hidden from our reality by superposition caused by the coherence of the LENR causative agent. The laser pulse does not form a coherent system therefore the destruction of matter is not hidden from our reality.
In transmutation caused by the LENR reaction, muons are produced, but they are hidden by quantum mechanical superposition of the active agent. All that we see is the cold ash that remains after the transmutation process has terminated, the muons are not realized or observed in our reality. Matter annihilation energy occurs in the LENR reaction but it is hidden from our view. It happens but it is invisible. We cannot feel its results. We cannot see or fell the mesons and muons that fly off into wherever and/or whenever. They are invisible to us and have no impact in our world. In the case of the Holmid reaction and the resulting proton decay, all the steps that occur in transmutation are realized in our reality as all the steps that occur are visible for our inspection. Such is a concrete example and a primer of how quantum mechanics works. But why does the laser pulse cause the reaction? Why does the laser pulse when it falls onto the surface of the Ultra Dense Hydrogen make protons fall apart? The onset of the laser is the setting point that starts the reaction of proton decay. When the laser light hits the surface of the UDH, the decay of matter happens almost instantaneously. BUT HOW??? Holmlid's paper got bounced recently from publication by peer review because the Holmlid reaction is violating the Conservation of baryon number. Baryon number https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon_number Quote The hypothetical concepts of grand unified theory (GUT) models and supersymmetry allows for the changing of a baryon into leptons and antiquarks (see B − L), thus violating the conservation of both baryon and lepton numbers. *Proton decay* would be an example of such a process taking place, but has never been observed. Protons cannot decay into mesons because that would violate the Conservation of baryon number and the conservation of charge. Quarks cannot just vanish, three quarks cannot transform into two quarks. But if quarks do, then WHY? I want to know WHY? Holmlid's reaction is based on the production of the Higgs field on the surface of the ultra dense hydrogen when the laser hits that surface, The Higgs field is a tachyonic field but what exactly are tachyonic fields? Domino Valdano, PhD Theoretical Physics tells us as follows: Quote In Einstein's theory of special relativity, the relationship between the energy, momentum, and mass of a particle is E2=(pc)^2+(mc2)^2 It was realized early on that if you plug in a negative value for m2 into this equation, you get a combination of momentum and energy that implies the particle must always travel faster than light. That is, v=pc2/E>c While the equations are consistent, it was never clear whether such a particle, which would have to have imaginary mass, could make sense or exist in the real world. In light of quantum field theory, now particles are thought of as excitations of a quantum field near the minimum of its potential energy curve. And there are now a couple different definitions of mass. One of the definitions of mass (sometimes called the "bare mass") is the square root of the quadratic coefficient of a quantum field in its potential energy. In many cases, this mass can be imaginary, and so it is sometimes called a "tachyonic mass". However, in any known physical cases where this happens (the most famous case being the Higgs boson), there is a change of coordinates one can do such that in the new coordinates, the mass is real and the physical particle travels at less than the speed of light. The "physical mass" of a particle is the square root of the quadratic coefficient of a field at the minimum of it's potential energy curve, which is by definition always real. If the mass-squared for some field like the Higgs is negative, what that means is that you're looking at a maximum (unstable point) of the potential energy curve rather than the minimum. Excitations near the maximum are not actually particles. If there is a field which has only a maximum and no minimum, then it is truly a tachyonic field (since there is no coordinate transformation you can do to make the mass real). This signifies that there is something wrong with the theory because there is no ground state energy for the field--and hence it cannot exist in the real world. Some people like to say that a tachyonic field represents an "instability of the vacuum". I would go a step further and say that it represents a field which has no vacuum (ground state). In summary, tachyons do show up in theoretical physics sometimes, but because physical particles must have a real (not an imaginary) physical mass, there are no particles in the real world which can travel faster than light. A tachyonic field is a field that produces and instability in the vacuum. The Higgs field is the the primary component of the vacuum and it is like a large pole that is finely balanced on the sharp point of a pin. A tachyonic field produces an instability of the vacuum like a force that disturbs the finely balanced pole that when perturbed will cause that pole to fall to a minimum energy state. Quote In his lecture on string theory and m-theory Lenny Susskind says that tachyons don't really move faster than the speed of light, and only "crackpots" will tell you that. Instead it has to do with that the vacuum is unstable, and that this is the source of the tachyons. If you want to watch the whole thing you can see it here: He starts to talk about the tachyonic field somewhere about 46:00 https://youtu.be/gCyImLu0HSI?t=2766 Click on the YouTube link to position to 46:00 into the Lenny Susskind lecture. In summary, what Holmlid has done is create a mechanism that creates a tachyonic field (a Higgs field) that produces an instability is the vacuum that causes matter to become unstable. This mechanism is the fundamental basis behind the LENR transmutation process. On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:31 PM Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > What exactly are tachyonic fields? > > Domino Valdano, PhD Theoretical Physics > > In Einstein's theory of special relativity, the relationship between the > energy, momentum, and mass of a particle is E2=(pc)^2+(mc2)^2 > > It was realized early on that if you plug in a negative value for m2 into > this equation, you get a combination of momentum and energy that implies > the particle must always travel faster than light. That is, v=pc2/E>c > > While the equations are consistent, it was never clear whether such a > particle, which would have to have imaginary mass, could make sense or > exist in the real world. > > In light of quantum field theory, now particles are thought of as > excitations of a quantum field near the minimum of its potential energy > curve. And there are now a couple different definitions of mass. One of > the definitions of mass (sometimes called the "bare mass") is the square > root of the quadratic coefficient of a quantum field in its potential > energy. In many cases, this mass can be imaginary, and so it is sometimes > called a "tachyonic mass". However, in any known physical cases where this > happens (the most famous case being the Higgs boson), there is a change of > coordinates one can do such that in the new coordinates, the mass is real > and the physical particle travels at less than the speed of light. The > "physical mass" of a particle is the square root of the quadratic > coefficient of a field at the minimum of it's potential energy curve, which > is by definition always real. > > If the mass-squared for some field like the Higgs is negative, what that > means is that you're looking at a maximum (unstable point) of the potential > energy curve rather than the minimum. Excitations near the maximum are not > actually particles. If there is a field which has only a maximum and no > minimum, then it is truly a tachyonic field (since there is no coordinate > transformation you can do to make the mass real). This signifies that > there is something wrong with the theory because there is no ground state > energy for the field--and hence it cannot exist in the real world. Some > people like to say that a tachyonic field represents an "instability of the > vacuum". I would go a step further and say that it represents a field > which has no vacuum (ground state). > > In summary, tachyons do show up in theoretical physics sometimes, but > because physical particles must have a real (not an imaginary) physical > mass, there are no particles in the real world which can travel faster than > light. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > A tachyonic field is a field that produces and instability in the vacuum. > The Higgs field is the the primary component of the vacuum and it is like a > large pole that is finely balanced on the sharp point of pin. A tachyonic > field produces an instability of the vacuum like a force that disturbs the > finely balanced pole that when perturbed will cause that pole to fall to a > minimum energy state. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In his lecture on string theory and m-theory Lenny Susskind says that > tachyons don't really move faster than the speed of light, and only > "crackpots" will tell you that. Instead it has to do with that the vacuum > is unstable, and that this is the source of the tachyons. If you want to > watch the whole thing you can see it here: > > He starts to talk about the tachyonic field somewhere about 46:00 > > https://youtu.be/gCyImLu0HSI?t=2766 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In summary, what Holmlid has done is create a mechanism that recreates a > tachyonic field (a Higgs field) that produces an instability is the vacuum > that causes matter to become unstable. This mechanism is the fundamental > basis behind the transmutation process. > > On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 4:13 PM Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What the Holmlid reaction shows is the naked transmutation process. This >> naked transmutation process is not hidden from our reality by superposition >> caused by the coherence of the LENR causative agent. The laser pulse does >> not form a coherent system therefore the destruction of matter is not >> hidden from our reality. >> >> In transmutation caused by the LENR reaction, muons are produced, but >> they are hidden by quantum mechanical superposition of the active agent. >> All that we see is the cold ash that remains after the transmutation >> process has terminated, the muons are not realized or observed in our >> reality. >> >> matter annihilation energy occurs in the LENR reaction but it is hidden >> from our view. It happens but it is invisible. We cannot feel its results. >> We cannot see or fell the mesons and muons that fly off into wherever >> and/or whenever. They are invisible to us and have no impact in our world. >> >> In the case of the Holmid reaction and the resulting proton decay, all >> the steps that occur in transmutation are realized in our reality as all >> the steps that occur are visible for our inspection. >> >> Such is a concrete example and a primer of how quantum mechanics works. >> >
