Fran,
The negative energy behavior that the polariton condensate demonstrates is associated with the Higgs field that the polaritons produce. The Higgs field is a techyonic field which has negative energy. Actually, the polariton condensate produces a dense Higgs field. This field produces the transmutation seen in LENR. The dense Higgs field is strong enough to cause and instability in the Higgs field in the vacuum. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyonic_field *Tachyonic fields play an important role in modern physics. Perhaps the most famous example of a tachyon is the Higgs boson <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson> of the Standard model of particle physics <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_model_of_particle_physics>. In its uncondensed <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon_condensation> phase, the square of the mass of the Higgs field <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_field> is negative, and therefore, the associated particle is a tachyon. * The energy generating channel of the LENR reaction is produced by the Hawking radiation effect. All that energy eventually turns out to be positive. The Big issue in quantum mechanics is the measurement problem. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qB7d5V71vUE The issue with LENR is that things that happen to particles happen to macro objects over very long time frames. The LENR system may stay in a state of superposition for hours or days. During that time, all interim products of transmutation including energy is lost to the observer. We only see what the LENR reaction has done is when the reaction has terminated. The Hawking radiation is outside of the LENR system and therefore experienced by the external observer. On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 8:27 PM Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil, > > Does it have to have negative mass from it’s own local > perspective/temporal frame? If the momentum includes relativistic terms > then Lorentzian effects might still limit local velocity to C. Which, I > assume, is why you included “whenever” with “wherever” the unseen muons > have gone. if I am reading your theory correctly, there should be a LOT of > energy being temporally and spatially distributed so there should be > easier to find indicators than muons, Note the calculation is beyond my > skill set but assuming lethal radiation is dissipating over great distance > via Lorentzian translation/dilation what should we be looking for ,and when > does it arrives in our frame? Time delay, frequency translation? I think > you may be close to a solution. > > Fran > > > > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, September 01, 2019 5:32 PM > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:How quantum mechanics works > > > > What exactly are tachyonic fields? > > Domino Valdano, PhD Theoretical Physics > > In Einstein's theory of special relativity, the relationship between the > energy, momentum, and mass of a particle is E2=(pc)^2+(mc2)^2 > > It was realized early on that if you plug in a negative value for m2 into > this equation, you get a combination of momentum and energy that implies > the particle must always travel faster than light. That is, v=pc2/E>c > > While the equations are consistent, it was never clear whether such a > particle, which would have to have imaginary mass, could make sense or > exist in the real world. > > In light of quantum field theory, now particles are thought of as > excitations of a quantum field near the minimum of its potential energy > curve. And there are now a couple different definitions of mass. One of > the definitions of mass (sometimes called the "bare mass") is the square > root of the quadratic coefficient of a quantum field in its potential > energy. In many cases, this mass can be imaginary, and so it is sometimes > called a "tachyonic mass". However, in any known physical cases where this > happens (the most famous case being the Higgs boson), there is a change of > coordinates one can do such that in the new coordinates, the mass is real > and the physical particle travels at less than the speed of light. The > "physical mass" of a particle is the square root of the quadratic > coefficient of a field at the minimum of it's potential energy curve, which > is by definition always real. > > If the mass-squared for some field like the Higgs is negative, what that > means is that you're looking at a maximum (unstable point) of the potential > energy curve rather than the minimum. Excitations near the maximum are not > actually particles. If there is a field which has only a maximum and no > minimum, then it is truly a tachyonic field (since there is no coordinate > transformation you can do to make the mass real). This signifies that > there is something wrong with the theory because there is no ground state > energy for the field--and hence it cannot exist in the real world. Some > people like to say that a tachyonic field represents an "instability of the > vacuum". I would go a step further and say that it represents a field > which has no vacuum (ground state). > > In summary, tachyons do show up in theoretical physics sometimes, but > because physical particles must have a real (not an imaginary) physical > mass, there are no particles in the real world which can travel faster than > light. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > A tachyonic field is a field that produces and instability in the vacuum. > The Higgs field is the the primary component of the vacuum and it is like a > large pole that is finely balanced on the sharp point of pin. A tachyonic > field produces an instability of the vacuum like a force that disturbs the > finely balanced pole that when perturbed will cause that pole to fall to a > minimum energy state. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In his lecture on string theory and m-theory Lenny Susskind says that > tachyons don't really move faster than the speed of light, and only > "crackpots" will tell you that. Instead it has to do with that the vacuum > is unstable, and that this is the source of the tachyons. If you want to > watch the whole thing you can see it here: > > He starts to talk about the tachyonic field somewhere about 46:00 > > https://youtu.be/gCyImLu0HSI?t=2766 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In summary, what Holmlid has done is create a mechanism that recreates a > tachyonic field (a Higgs field) that produces an instability is the vacuum > that causes matter to become unstable. This mechanism is the fundamental > basis behind the transmutation process. > > > > On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 4:13 PM Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > What the Holmlid reaction shows is the naked transmutation process. This > naked transmutation process is not hidden from our reality by superposition > caused by the coherence of the LENR causative agent. The laser pulse does > not form a coherent system therefore the destruction of matter is not > hidden from our reality. > > In transmutation caused by the LENR reaction, muons are produced, but they > are hidden by quantum mechanical superposition of the active agent. All > that we see is the cold ash that remains after the transmutation process > has terminated, the muons are not realized or observed in our reality. > > matter annihilation energy occurs in the LENR reaction but it is hidden > from our view. It happens but it is invisible. We cannot feel its results. > We cannot see or fell the mesons and muons that fly off into wherever > and/or whenever. They are invisible to us and have no impact in our world. > > In the case of the Holmid reaction and the resulting proton decay, all the > steps that occur in transmutation are realized in our reality as all the > steps that occur are visible for our inspection. > > Such is a concrete example and a primer of how quantum mechanics works. > >
