Two questions that are currently speculative and open that don't get much
press (because they are speculative, I guess, and likely will cause undue
alarm)
- Is sars2 bi-phasic ('like anthrax')
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/02/27/national/diamond-princess-coronavirus-2/
If it is bi-phasic, how infectious are folks who haven't quite recovered?
- Is there really an HIV mutation in sars2 that makes it 1000 times more
stronger than sars?
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3052495/coronavirus-far-more-likely-sars-bond-human-cells-scientists-say
There is a lot of HIV discussion around coronavirus. Hard to weed through
all the noise. Doctors self administering hiv meds, india paper (since
withdrawn -
https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Caixin/Scientists-slam-Indian-study-that-fueled-coronavirus-rumors)
implying that HIV was artificially added to virus.
If sars2 is bi-phasic and does have an HIV mutation (artificial or
otherwise), I can only imagine the panic that will result.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:26 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:58:45 -0500:
> Hi,
> >*All schools in Japan told to close until April over virus outbreak*
> >
> >
> https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/02/27/national/hokkaido-coronavirus-school/#.XlfJtmhKg2w
> >
> [snip]
>
> First they take a stringent measure, then immediately blow holes in it, by
> creating exemptions.
> [snip]
> Regards,
>
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> local asymmetry = temporary success
>
>
