`Good to know some more physicists start to think about time. One of them`

`cited I did know personally.`

`The real problem is the missing education in computation theory. I did`

`spend 2 net years working on the theme, which the article tries to`

`illuminate. I developed a new computer architecture that can deal with`

`such problems and delivers fail safe proven results on wide area`

`parallel machines.`

`A wide area parallel machine is exactly what physics is about. Each`

`particle is a "program" that communicates with an other programs over a`

`given finite set of messages. Physics defines these messages as`

`equations what defines a set of of possible tokens = interactions -`

`nothing else.`

`Now if you know the basic laws of communication theory then it is`

`obvious = given that there is no global time. We only do have a partial`

`order over communications. We can refine the order digit by digits until`

`we meet the border-line of information stability in measurement.`

`The article is full of nonsense and classical bullshit knowledge like`

`two Uranium-239 are equal but one decays earlier. SM knows nothing about`

`particle structure except some basic Lego like partitions. All unstable`

`nuclei contain a time like structure with a slightly different excess`

`energy. Further who tells these guys all these nuclei did start at the`

`same timestamp?`

`Also neither QM nor general relativity are fundamental models. This is a`

`religious claim. QM just describes a small subset of the reality and`

`general relativity fails for all *space filled with matter* as it cannot`

`handle matter... As all other simplistic SM models GER just works for`

`point masses in empty space. Any perturbation of "space-time" by mass`

`producing an other space time cannot be handled without simplistic`

`approximations.`

`If a point source emits two photons at an angle of 180 degrees then any`

`measurement will show that the gap between the two increases with 2*c`

`the speed of light. Thus we can easily measure relative speed > c. If`

`these two photons enter a spherical orbit then they will return to the`

`place of origin. This is the situation in SO(4) in much smaller space`

`dimensions. According GER the photons should never interact again. Thus`

`this just shows that the notion of an universal time in curved space is`

`mathematical nonsense. Time is just the measurement interval or the`

`frequency what ever you like more.`

`Most current physicists do have the wrong education to tackle the real`

`basic problems of physics. Even worse theses physicists day for day`

`repeat religious claims about models that luckily for us work well under`

`some restricted conditions.`

`Current physics especially nuclear & particle physics is still on day`

`one in playground of Kindergarden. These folks soon will have their`

`mental corona event, when the have to notice that the perturbation of a`

`proton at 10 TeV (CERN) is absolutely irrelevant for understanding`

`today's real problems like aneutronic fusion in Holmlids case or LENR as`

`we measure it - just to name two big ones.`

J.W. Am 10.04.20 um 22:42 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com:

The following link contains two or 3 differing concepts of time. _https://www.quantamagazine.org/does-time-really-flow-new-clues-come-from-a-century-old-approach-to-math-20200407/_The SO(4) physics model of nucleons is a model including a temporaltime scale associated with a magnetic rotating flux at a specificfrequency. This “temporal time” reflects space parameters and theobserved phenomena of EM photon propagation in space controlled bythose parameters , magnetic permeability and electric permittivity.A good model for space and its “intrinsic” parameters is warranted IMHO. Bob Cook

-- Jürg Wyttenbach Bifangstr.22 8910 Affoltern a.A. 044 760 14 18 079 246 36 06