Good to know some more physicists start to think about time. One of them
cited I did know personally.
The real problem is the missing education in computation theory. I did
spend 2 net years working on the theme, which the article tries to
illuminate. I developed a new computer architecture that can deal with
such problems and delivers fail safe proven results on wide area
parallel machines.
A wide area parallel machine is exactly what physics is about. Each
particle is a "program" that communicates with an other programs over a
given finite set of messages. Physics defines these messages as
equations what defines a set of of possible tokens = interactions -
nothing else.
Now if you know the basic laws of communication theory then it is
obvious = given that there is no global time. We only do have a partial
order over communications. We can refine the order digit by digits until
we meet the border-line of information stability in measurement.
The article is full of nonsense and classical bullshit knowledge like
two Uranium-239 are equal but one decays earlier. SM knows nothing about
particle structure except some basic Lego like partitions. All unstable
nuclei contain a time like structure with a slightly different excess
energy. Further who tells these guys all these nuclei did start at the
same timestamp?
Also neither QM nor general relativity are fundamental models. This is a
religious claim. QM just describes a small subset of the reality and
general relativity fails for all *space filled with matter* as it cannot
handle matter... As all other simplistic SM models GER just works for
point masses in empty space. Any perturbation of "space-time" by mass
producing an other space time cannot be handled without simplistic
approximations.
If a point source emits two photons at an angle of 180 degrees then any
measurement will show that the gap between the two increases with 2*c
the speed of light. Thus we can easily measure relative speed > c. If
these two photons enter a spherical orbit then they will return to the
place of origin. This is the situation in SO(4) in much smaller space
dimensions. According GER the photons should never interact again. Thus
this just shows that the notion of an universal time in curved space is
mathematical nonsense. Time is just the measurement interval or the
frequency what ever you like more.
Most current physicists do have the wrong education to tackle the real
basic problems of physics. Even worse theses physicists day for day
repeat religious claims about models that luckily for us work well under
some restricted conditions.
Current physics especially nuclear & particle physics is still on day
one in playground of Kindergarden. These folks soon will have their
mental corona event, when the have to notice that the perturbation of a
proton at 10 TeV (CERN) is absolutely irrelevant for understanding
today's real problems like aneutronic fusion in Holmlids case or LENR as
we measure it - just to name two big ones.
J.W.
Am 10.04.20 um 22:42 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com:
The following link contains two or 3 differing concepts of time.
_https://www.quantamagazine.org/does-time-really-flow-new-clues-come-from-a-century-old-approach-to-math-20200407/_
The SO(4) physics model of nucleons is a model including a temporal
time scale associated with a magnetic rotating flux at a specific
frequency. This “temporal time” reflects space parameters and the
observed phenomena of EM photon propagation in space controlled by
those parameters , magnetic permeability and electric permittivity.
A good model for space and its “intrinsic” parameters is warranted IMHO.
Bob Cook
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
