I like it. Makes sense to me. 👍 On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 23:27, Jürg Wyttenbach <[email protected]> wrote:
> Good to know some more physicists start to think about time. One of them > cited I did know personally. > > The real problem is the missing education in computation theory. I did > spend 2 net years working on the theme, which the article tries to > illuminate. I developed a new computer architecture that can deal with such > problems and delivers fail safe proven results on wide area parallel > machines. > > A wide area parallel machine is exactly what physics is about. Each > particle is a "program" that communicates with an other programs over a > given finite set of messages. Physics defines these messages as equations > what defines a set of of possible tokens = interactions - nothing else. > > Now if you know the basic laws of communication theory then it is obvious > = given that there is no global time. We only do have a partial order over > communications. We can refine the order digit by digits until we meet the > border-line of information stability in measurement. > > The article is full of nonsense and classical bullshit knowledge like two > Uranium-239 are equal but one decays earlier. SM knows nothing about > particle structure except some basic Lego like partitions. All unstable > nuclei contain a time like structure with a slightly different excess > energy. Further who tells these guys all these nuclei did start at the same > timestamp? > > Also neither QM nor general relativity are fundamental models. This is a > religious claim. QM just describes a small subset of the reality and > general relativity fails for all *space filled with matter* as it cannot > handle matter... As all other simplistic SM models GER just works for point > masses in empty space. Any perturbation of "space-time" by mass producing > an other space time cannot be handled without simplistic approximations. > > If a point source emits two photons at an angle of 180 degrees then any > measurement will show that the gap between the two increases with 2*c the > speed of light. Thus we can easily measure relative speed > c. If these two > photons enter a spherical orbit then they will return to the place of > origin. This is the situation in SO(4) in much smaller space dimensions. > According GER the photons should never interact again. Thus this just shows > that the notion of an universal time in curved space is mathematical > nonsense. Time is just the measurement interval or the frequency what ever > you like more. > > Most current physicists do have the wrong education to tackle the real > basic problems of physics. Even worse theses physicists day for day repeat > religious claims about models that luckily for us work well under some > restricted conditions. > > Current physics especially nuclear & particle physics is still on day one > in playground of Kindergarden. These folks soon will have their mental > corona event, when the have to notice that the perturbation of a proton at > 10 TeV (CERN) is absolutely irrelevant for understanding today's real > problems like aneutronic fusion in Holmlids case or LENR as we measure it - > just to name two big ones. > > J.W. > > > Am 10.04.20 um 22:42 schrieb [email protected]: > > > > The following link contains two or 3 differing concepts of time. > > > > *https://www.quantamagazine.org/does-time-really-flow-new-clues-come-from-a-century-old-approach-to-math-20200407/ > <https://www.quantamagazine.org/does-time-really-flow-new-clues-come-from-a-century-old-approach-to-math-20200407/>* > > > > The SO(4) physics model of nucleons is a model including a temporal time > scale associated with a magnetic rotating flux at a specific frequency. > This “temporal time” reflects space parameters and the observed phenomena > of EM photon propagation in space controlled by those parameters , > magnetic permeability and electric permittivity. > > > > A good model for space and its “intrinsic” parameters is warranted IMHO. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > > -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr.22 > 8910 Affoltern a.A. > 044 760 14 18 > 079 246 36 06 > >
