Freeman Dyson explains why he is comfortable without unification: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcicI_GJGcM Harry
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:30 PM ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote: > >>it might be preferable to accept them as each true within their > respective domains<< > > When "they" talk of those "domains" - there is a lot of handwaving; > general relativity is often said to breakdown at the singularity, and > quantum mechanics supposedly fails to be able to deal with gravity; but no > maths for that is presented as to precisely when equations from such > theories fail. > > On Monday, 8 June 2020, 20:03:09 BST, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:30 PM ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: > > >>Thoughts?<< > > there are problems combining relativity (especially general relativity) > with quantum physics, so when people try to talk from things combining them > then they are not on solid ground. > > > I only mentioned SR because it is often wrongly invoked to dismiss any > experiment needing simultaneity. > On the issue reconciling the two domains of quantum mechanics and SR/GR, > instead of trying to change one or the other or both, it might be > preferable to accept them as each true within their respective domains and > build a bridge between the domains by integrating them technologically > instead trying to merge them into a single mathematical theory. > > Harry > > > > > From my point-of-view relativity has been mistranslated and misunderstood > so false claims are made about it. My latest video-I think it was mainly > written by his wife. > > > > > > On Wednesday, 3 June 2020, 17:25:51 BST, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Quantum Non-locality explained by Sabine Hossenfelder > https://youtu.be/XL9wWeEmQvo > > I disagree with the conclusion that non-locality cannot be used to send an > FLT message. What is overlooked is that an indeterminate state, i.e. > unmeasured state is also a type of information. > > If the transmitter and the receiver have synchronised clocks (which is > possible in SR) then the transmitter can send a message by a sequence of > binary choices: either measure or not measure the particle's spin in the > diagonal direction at a given time. What the receiver detects will be > meaningfully informed by the sequence of the transmitter's choices. > > Thoughts? > > Harry > >
