>>it might be preferable to accept them as each true within their respective
>>domains<<
When "they" talk of those "domains" - there is a lot of handwaving; general
relativity is often said to breakdown at the singularity, and quantum mechanics
supposedly fails to be able to deal with gravity; but no maths for that is
presented as to precisely when equations from such theories fail.
On Monday, 8 June 2020, 20:03:09 BST, H LV <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:30 PM ROGER ANDERTON <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>Thoughts?<<
there are problems combining relativity (especially general relativity) with
quantum physics, so when people try to talk from things combining them then
they are not on solid ground.
I only mentioned SR because it is often wrongly invoked to dismiss any
experiment needing simultaneity. On the issue reconciling the two domains of
quantum mechanics and SR/GR, instead of trying to change one or the other or
both, it might be preferable to accept them as each true within their
respective domains and build a bridge between the domains by integrating them
technologically instead trying to merge them into a single mathematical theory.
Harry
>From my point-of-view relativity has been mistranslated and misunderstood so
>false claims are made about it. My latest video-I think it was mainly written
>by his wife.
On Wednesday, 3 June 2020, 17:25:51 BST, H LV <[email protected]> wrote:
Quantum Non-locality explained by Sabine
Hossenfelderhttps://youtu.be/XL9wWeEmQvo
I disagree with the conclusion that non-locality cannot be used to send an FLT
message. What is overlooked is that an indeterminate state, i.e. unmeasured
state is also a type of information.
If the transmitter and the receiver have synchronised clocks (which is possible
in SR) then the transmitter can send a message by a sequence of binary choices:
either measure or not measure the particle's spin in the diagonal direction at
a given time. What the receiver detects will be meaningfully informed by the
sequence of the transmitter's choices.
Thoughts?
Harry
