Robin wrote:
Snip.
>
> This is for a solid torus, and I'm not sure whether the mass is
> inside, on, or outside the torus. Nevertheless, taking it at face
> value, one would only get a difference in angular momentum of 2
> parts in a billion, assuming a torus with the dimensions given,
> and I think that's probably near the limit of current measurements
> anyway.
> inside, on, or outside the torus. Nevertheless, taking it at face
> value, one would only get a difference in angular momentum of 2
> parts in a billion, assuming a torus with the dimensions given,
> and I think that's probably near the limit of current measurements
> anyway.
>
Are you are puffing on that Havana Tampa and blowing
WHO R U? Toroids, while Frank is sniffing the volatile vapors
from a can of Beta Ether? ....Hmmm. :-)
Let me say that the disk/flat-washer particle is merely a section
of a torus, or a torus flattened out by the enormous beta ether pressure.
One can do some calculating based on lineal permeability (uo) and permittivity
(eo) of space and the energy contained in a particle.
For the electron-positron or pion: L = hc*uo/E and C = hc*eo/E
Z ~ = Zo = (L/C)^1/2 ~ = 377 ohms T = h/E
q = +/- 1.602e-19 coulombs, (the sign is merely a 180 degree phase
conjugate of y = sin x.)
E = 1/2 CV^2 V = (E/.5C)^1/2 = 8.7e4 Volts
Internal Displacement Current I = q*E/h = 19.7 amperes.
IOW, will your proposed Toroidal Electron "ring/oscillate" like a resonant LC (tank?)
circuit any better than the Loop/Disk Particle, that the String Theory advocates,
came up with?
Or does the Superconducting Torus that will "Ring" for decades
do any better than a much simpler SC washer?
Fred
