Re: Gravitomagnetic Field Quantified

[Frederick Sparber]

 

What I deduced from Dr. Kelly's work (17 page pdf):

 

http://www.marmet.ca/louis/induction_faraday/kelly/KellyFa3.pdf

 

was that the intrinsic spin mvr = h/2(pi) of the fundamental particles (or a stacked particle group) with an intrinsic magnetic field

proportional to mass have an acceleration   v^2/r  that creates the Gravitomagnetic Field.

 

Vortex-l Archives thread (Re: Spinning Supermagnet Levitation):

 

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg02696.html

 

 

What goes around comes around.

 

Fred

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Frederick Sparber

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

Sent: 3/24/2006 3:50:25 AM

Subject: Re: Gravitomagnetic Field Quantified

http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM0L6OVGJE_index_0.html

 

"Their experiment involves a ring of superconducting material rotating up to 6 500 times a minute. Superconductors are special materials that lose all electrical resistance at a certain temperature. Spinning superconductors produce a weak magnetic field, the so-called London moment."

"Small acceleration sensors placed at different locations close to the spinning superconductor, which has to be accelerated for the effect to be noticeable, recorded an acceleration field outside the superconductor that appears to be produced by gravitomagnetism. "This experiment is the gravitational analogue of Faraday's electromagnetic induction experiment in 1831."

 

Been there last year.  We used one-dollar Radioshacjk electric motors that

go up to ~8,000 RPM spinning ring "Nd Supermagnets" sitting on a digital scale.  :-)

 

 

 

Horace's Post:

 

Re: Spinning Supermagnet Levitation

 

At 5:00 AM 2/3/5, Frederick Sparber wrote:
[snip]
>These experiments (thanks to Colin Quinney) support that contention, but,
>the force will
>only be 0.075 lbs ( 34 grams) heavier or lighter at 7200 RPM.
>
http://www.marmet.ca/louis/induction_faraday/kelly/KellyFa3.pdf