I don't think we are very far apart on the issue, David.
The Displacement Current in any particle I = C *dV/dt where C = eo * wavelength (hc/E)
sets up an enormous B field.
Another approach is I = q*f where f = c/wavelength = 19.7 amperes for the electron
and 12,056 amperes for each of the three "quarks" in the proton.
R = wavelength/2(pi) 3.86e-13 meters & 6.3e-16 meters for the radius of
the electron and each of the 3 discs (quarks) stacked side-by-side in the proton
2 up or plus cw and 1 minus ccw giving an enormous "solenoid-like B field.
This GSU interactive calculator will give you the value of the B field s.
and total spin mcr = h/2(pi) will give acceleration c^/r.
BTW. I was corresponding with Hal Puthoff and others on this in the mid to late 1980s.
Hope this helps.
Fred
----- Original Message -----From: David JonssonSent: 3/24/2006 4:55:42 AMSubject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Gravitomagnetic Field QuantifiedThis comes from lack of understanding of basic electromagnetic field theory.Quoted: "Just as a moving electrical charge creates a magnetic field, so a moving mass generates a gravitomagnetic field"A moving electric charge creates a magnetic field which is the same as an inertial force. For an electron the field energy outside the electron grows as mv^2/3 which shows that inertia for the electron actually is to most part electrodynamical reluctance. Here is the connection between inertia and electromagnetism. The connection between inertia and gravitation comes from the principle of equivalence in genereal relativity.Hence in ordinary matter something like 1/4000 of the inertia(=gravity) is caused by the electron reluctance. This is what they have found in the lab. No surprise.Do I have to be more precise? I wrote an article in 1994 showing the electromagnetical origin of the so called mass of the electron. The mass of the electron is determined by it's inertia which is electromagnetical.
The qouted sentence should read:Quoted: "Just as a moving electrical charge creates a magnetic field and thus apparent inertia, so a moving mass generates a similar field magnetic field with associated inertia"Superconductivity means that the electron must moove without magnetic reluctance (at least without generating dissipative magnetic fields) and thus it also looses it's inertia. This is very simple basic electromagnetic knowledge. No need for general relativity.Some parts of science has incorporated this like solid state physics. They speek of effective mass of the electron instead of seeing it as some fixed natural constant. Electron mass and inertia depends on the space parameter susceptibility and permittivity, ยต and epsilon. I belong to those who understand general relativity curvature of space just as a change in the permittivity and susceptibility. Harold Puthoff has developed this description of general relativity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizable_vacuumDavid
----- Original Message -----From: Frederick SparberSent: 3/24/2006 3:50:25 AMSubject: Re: Gravitomagnetic Field Quantified
"Their experiment involves a ring of superconducting material rotating up to 6 500 times a minute. Superconductors are special materials that lose all electrical resistance at a certain temperature. Spinning superconductors produce a weak magnetic field, the so-called London moment.""Small acceleration sensors placed at different locations close to the spinning superconductor, which has to be accelerated for the effect to be noticeable, recorded an acceleration field outside the superconductor that appears to be produced by gravitomagnetism. "This experiment is the gravitational analogue of Faraday's electromagnetic induction experiment in 1831."Been there last year. We used one-dollar Radioshacjk electric motors thatgo up to ~8,000 RPM spinning ring "Nd Supermagnets" sitting on a digital scale. :-)
