On 11/29/06, Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Terry wrote:
> ... others have confirmed
> the measurements since your conjecture.
Hi Terry, have the splendid overunity COPs you mentioned in recent posts been
confirmed by the same expert who measured a COP of 0.25 on an earlier version?
No. A potential licensee visited recently and brought his technical
advisor who had a BSEE and a PhD in physics. He first said that the
idea was "hogwash" and asked if he could perform his own measurements.
Of course, Paul consented.
After several minutes of taking measurements, the good doktor placed
his finger on the electromagnet and found it cool. He then placed his
finger on the light bulb being used as a load and burned his finger.
Paul said the man had a moment of what appeared to be cognitive
dissonance; then, he went and whispered in the ear of the licensee.
At that point the licensee told the President of M Int'l that they
needed to go offsite and talk.
Didn't Sprain already think he had overunity when he bought that analysis in
2002 BTW?
No. There have been 16 iterations of the Magmo. He did not claim OU
until the spring of this year.
Just be patient. The new magnet is under construction. It is
segmented in such a way that the torque will be linear instead of
ramped sinusoidal as shown in the test you referenced. The sinusoidal
torque is due to the use of rectangular magnets. The simulations by
the magnet manufacturer show a near linear torque curve.
Terry
