Paul wrote: > Harry Veeder wrote: >> Paul, >> >> >> I think what you are alluding to is more correctly > called "power" >> rather than "energy". Indeed, "power" can be > defined without the >> concept of "energy". > > > Hi Harry, > > The discussion was regarding PE. So I was referring > to energy. >
I know. Let be more frank. If PE irrelevant to physics then so is the concept of _energy_. However, as I tried to explain, the concept of _power_ is still relevant. Harry
