Hi Paul, > No, my definition of thugs is people working for the cause to suppress technology considered dangerous in the hands of terrorists or rogue countries such as Iran or North Korea.
You mean like machine guns, hand grenades, and nuclear bombs? It's a little late for that, don't you think? And what business do you have providing technology to rogue countries in the first place? > If that breaks your laws of physics then so be it. What does it matter to you whether it breaks my laws of physics? It's the establishment you need to impress with your extensive knowledge, not me. If you claim to have new technology, you need to show the science behind it does not violate any known laws of physics and adds something new that we didn't know before. Certainly your "new technology" doesn't have anything to do with using a battery in a new way, upside-down for example. What do you think you could possibly have figured out that hundreds of thousands of top minds working directly for the military haven't already thought of? Unless you have found a new way to quantify physics, or added new laws, you haven't got any "new technology." > > You ought to be careful; you are starting to sound like a conspiracy > > theorist with an imaginary agenda. > No, I go by the laws of probability. And the laws of probability prevents you from sounding like a conspiracy theorist because...? It didn't catch that. You're still sounding like a conspiracy theorist. > Are you the guy with the Aether theory of everything? > If so then when are you going to start on the list provided in another thread? Are you telling me what to do? Would you like me to tell you what to do? Dave
