Zachary Jones wrote:

Funny that ORMUS comes up here - a nice emergence. I worked with Barry a while ago; even pitched the ozonation tech he is connected with at a DOE shindig in 2001. I have a giant poster session in a closet somewheres. Seems like an age ago.

Even back then they were pretty hush-hush about the exact nature of the tech. If we reminisced long enough, and I dug deep enough, I could probably turn up notes or such from my conversations with him. Intuition tells me, though, that not enough info was named to reproduce a mechanism (why, anyway? if there's value here then, all parties interested in the best for things, should be able to cooperate) They were on the down-low about it because it had produced the first ORMUS-like material, but because of a lack of controls had also poisoned one of the inventors. Barry's bio talks about it a bit, here: http://www.subtleenergies.com/ORMUS/tw/barrybio.htm

(maybe this is not news, here)


Well - the Ormus stuff and David Hudson, in particular, have been mentioned many times in the (far) past on vortex. Some of that was tainted by the connection to the infamous Joe Champion, who used to post here before 'the law' caught up with him; and take the heat for his rather strange pseudo-science methods. Perhaps 'tainted' is not the correct wording, as the jury is still out on some aspects of that episode (not the criminal jury, which did not find Champion's work convincing, but the only one which really counts- the jury of historical revisionism which is part of the human meme-pool, so to speak).

I would say the overall impression of that entire scene was far from positive BUT that is to be expected for anything which is both so removed from the mainstream, and without much laboratory validation - and Hudson himself has all the ear-markings of a PT Barnum type of character, and few of the traits of a dedicated scientist. If you hear him in person, you are likely to be far more convinced than otherwise.

Nevertheless - all of this subfield of inquiry came before "excitonics".

The exciton changes everything, and together with QM and the quasi-BEC (i.e. "RTT BEC" or room temperature transitory Bose Einstein Condensate) may end up validating parts of the Ormus concept - (and parts of LENR as well) who knows?

BTW - the Wiki entry on this subject (exciton) is woefully inadequate and misses much of the latest R&D which is largely being performed by such heavyweights as Intel, AMD and IBM-Almaden but with little in the way of published results. If not for my personal proximity to this area and having an associates who is at least tangentially involved with this R&D, it would be largely hidden from view.

This new cast of characters, the Intel-clique, would probably never admit to even knowing-of the term: Ormus, or of Hudson, Champion, Carter, and the like - but they may end-up validating some of that prior work in surprising ways.

And you can be sure that the same hits turn up on google for their staff as you get - so they do "know" of it, even if they will never acknowledge it publicly, due to the aforementioned taint of pseudo-science.

Jones


Reply via email to