Unadulterated brutal observation of clues and correlations without any assumptions or prejuduce as to how things are working. (Avoiding theory for repeated empirical observations)
Basically let the evidence speak for it's self and strain to listen. The other Leg in the Tripod IMO is full detailed disclosure, everything need to replicate. On 10/12/07, John Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IMO there isn't an issue. > > The skeptics are automatically disinteresting, just ignore them. They are > irrelevant (unless of course they are effecting employment/funding) as they > are not really in the same field (discovery). > Might as well be arguing with a short order cheif about CF. > > It's a case of going back to the drawing board and getting it to work well > enough and practically enough that it's worth making to save money on > heating/power. (at that point skeptics will be hard to find) > > Arguing with skeptics (excepting above exception) is just scientific > masturbation. > Just figure out what is required for proper operation, easier said than > done but until then there is nothing worth arguing about really. > > I don't think most people who are logically/scientifically dishonest > (consciously or otherwise) can change. (Not by mean of discussion at any > rate, utterly pointless) > > > On 10/12/07, PHILIP WINESTONE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Um... The scientific/rational side of me says "What?" > > > > The non-rational (intuitive) side of me says, "What.?" > > > > Two different "whats". So there's your answer. > > > > P. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 9:13:28 PM > > Subject: Re: [VO]: Tripod base required for LENR > > > > Philip wrote.. > > > > >In fact we all do it; when we meet someone, we know almost immediately > > who or what we're dealing with, although we >more often than not deny what > > we're seeing or hide from it. > > >Human stuff. > > > > Howdy Philip and Bill, > > > > Been an interesting and revealing thread. Remember I was born three > > generations back. > > Let me add a thought that touches on the " third rail" and can get me in > > all kinds of trouble... > > > > women in the work place and positions of authority. > > > > Background.. it has only been this generation that has experienced a > > situation where women are in leadership positions in business, law and > > government. > > > > Has this resulted in a change in the dynamic of interaction between men > > in the scientific realm for the better or worse? > > > > Richard > > > > >
