On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Jones Beene wrote:

> I find Bill's T-coil comparison enlightening ;-) but lacking (in the
> sense of apples-to-oranges) wrt to the latest experiment -- where there
> is NO, ZERO, NADA, signal... merely ground, or DrS's touch.

Ah, that's different!

:)

I totally missed any announcement that self-acting or "closed-loop"
operation was achieved. Did a video mention it?  Or a message here? All I
saw was discussions of 12V power supply in early videos, but I didn't see
any announcement that the device started running by itself.  So that
explains all the uproar about scoffer sneers, and about needing a Faraday
shield.

Running by itself *IS* closing the loop.  All oscillators involve a
feedback loop and a gain device or "amplifier" (i.e. an energy source.)

And yes a Faraday shield does not need ground *IF* the entire circuit is
inside, with no external connections at all.  If the circuit needs a
ground wire, then the Faraday cage won't provide much shielding unless
it's connected to the ground wire too.  If a circuit is electrically
floating, then, depending on the e-field in which it floats, it can see
the Earth as a signal generator.

Still, the AM broadcast tower gives me the creeps.  And there might be
high-power microwave links involved with that transmitter installation.

If I'd made such a breakthrough, the first thing I'd do is take the
circuit to some other ground many miles away.  If it kept working, then
try other places too.  If it always works, then... success!  But if it
stopped working, then I'd get myself a ground-stake so the circuit is
portable, then take the circuit to various distances from the tower and
see if its output is proportional to tower-to-circuit distance.  Or maybe
his entire lab is sitting in a low power microwave beam, and the circuit
will stop working if moved very far at all.

Where anomalous physics is concerned, I wouldn't trust shielding or
calculations or ANYTHING.  Maybe there's a mistake with the shielding, or
maybe, while there's no anomalous energy source, yet physics is violated
and RF from the AM tower is somehow getting into the circuit anyway.  The
frequency is different from AM broadcast, but maybe that's some odd effect
which ends up letting the AM signal create different frequencies.  To make
TOTALLY SURE it's not somehow powered from the AM tower or other unknown
high-power RF source, make sure it works with many ground points and not
just the one in his lab.


>
> Not mention -- that he is now driving 20 LEDs with the
> circuit.

I bet he can hook a tiny "solar cell" motor in parallel with one or
several LEDS and get it to spin.  Stick a glob of scotch tape on the shaft
so it's obvious for the videos.  Radio Shack sells those (or at least they
did recently.)



> Catch-22 it is "cold electricity," whatever that is,
> and yes it is certainly higher voltage - but
> apparently only registers ~200 volts, zero current in
> the circuit

It's VERY hard to measure RF high-voltage in tiny circuits, since small
devices give high impedance at high volts, and most probes short out the
signal, giving very low readings.  Connecting a measuring instrument can
make everything stop working.  You have to set up some kind of non-contact
probe which senses the signal across an empty gap, then calibrate that
probe to a signal of solidly-known lower voltage of the same frequency.


> Unfortunately, all the negative insinuations (as opposed to replication
> attempts) have driven Ron to pull the plug, so to speak, on public input
> from him to the various forums which were discussing this.

Heh.  The unstated purpose of unmoderated forums is to let cowards deliver
insults without any danger of physical violence.  And also to allow
participation in flamewars, of course.

The purpose of vortex-L is to provide an option to public groups: a
semi-hidden, moderated forum where scoffers are mostly excluded and
flamewars are eventually extinguished.

But if Ron doesn't like Vortex-L, he should go over to JLN Labs or
another big frontier-science list.

I STRONGLY suggest avoiding what's usually done: creating an
invitation-only Yahoo list.  History shows that this doesn't work, since
it's basically the same as secrecy.  Secrecy destroys frontier science.
It's the kiss of death.





(((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))
William J. Beaty                            SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com                         http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits   amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
Seattle, WA  425-222-5066    unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci

Reply via email to