Important, but partial replications by three parties, in three different
areas of the world (far away from AM towers) has now come-in on Stefan
Hartmann's German forum. More and better efforts are almost certainly
only a few days away.
One of them uses a Neo magnet which is of course a permanent magnet,
which is a huge variation and that circuit is said to have no measurable
current input, but it does have a signal input (of lower frequency than
DrS). The experimenter sez: "I know this is very loose and fast
experimentation but I had to let you know that it basically works as
advertised...
Anyone concerned that the location of Dr. Stiffler's Laboratory near the
50KW transmitter might be an issue should now give that argument up for
dead, as AM broadcast has essentially been eliminated as contributory.
The ultimate source of power for Dr Stiffler's brilliant flash of
experimental genius is unknown and speculative. Below is my slightly
reworded hypothesis for a ZPE functionality and the surrounding details
(via so called cold-electricity and Dicke sub-super-radiance).
To be precise, the proximate cause may be a see-saw of Dicke sub and
super-radiance, which works via a more remote cause (or effect) which is
the "cold" electron (via tunneling) but the ultimate power source is the
ZPF (the zero point field). Since ZPE is an "outside" source of energy,
there is technically no LoT or CoE violation.
First off, no one is suggesting that a high Q factor in an inductor is
gainful in itself. In fact in the Stiffler circuit, the inductors could
mere be expedient, as opposed to necessary.
Although those pursuing so-called "free-energy" love the "room full of
tuning-forks" analogy - and there is plenty of lore claiming barium
magnets will "ring" for a long enough time, such that excess energy can
be tapped, that has never been demonstrated reliably, and probably
demands a secondary system to work with in concert.
It is a more complicated situation whether or not a small additional
signal can "ride on" the ringing in a dual input system - even though
neither input system is gainful initially but both are efficient. That
small boost would then be able to 'reflux' or compound itself. This
would be the synergy of two unrelated systems, and in the recent history
of the Stiffler circuit, this merger of two unrelated themes is
precisely the genesis of the experiment. Synergy appears from the
serendipitous alignment of two experiments under "inspired" guidance.
These days, most every lender (or borrower) appreciates compound
interest. You add a few per cent per year and before long your principal
has been doubled. At 18 Mhz, cohering even a miniscule gain per cycle-
say a few parts per million, this may be significant enough to allow the
circuit to self-sustain on one side, while emitting another form of
energy on another side.
However, it is strongly suspected that any putative net gain in such a
refluxing system must be in oranges ;-)
IOW the net gain cannot be electrical when the P-in is electrical. P-out
could be in photons or torque maybe, but it cannot be apples-to-apples
for the simple reason that we would lose too many old Fizzix professors
to heart failure, if not the embarrassment ....
As mentioned in a previous post, the Q or quality factor compares the
time constant for decay of an oscillating physical system's amplitude to
its oscillation period.
Equivalently, it compares the frequency at which a system oscillates to
the rate at which it dissipates its energy. A higher Q indicates a lower
rate of energy dissipation relative to the oscillation frequency. But if
the dissipation per cycle is low enough then a low boost will push it back.
For visual example, a heavy pendulum suspended from 30 meters would have
a high Q and swing for a very long time, and when cleverly installed can
cohere a bit of earth's rotational energy. There is ample perp-mo lore
about a few Foucault pendula and various thuribles.
IOW any system having a high-Q would be poised to allow ambient, or
ubiquitous energy from outside its immediate system to be cohered or to
modulate the oscillation. You would still need to engineer the method of
coherence (modulation) but the high-Q inductor "sets the table".
The biggest question about the Stiffler circuit for me is - do we have a
negative resistance range in the series wired LEDs, to provide the small
gain via a repeated EMF cascade, or avalanche? Or is there also a
quasi-EMF component, which input is adding an additional tiny boost on
each oscillation ?
... the quasi-EMF component may consist not of electrons, per se, but of
"degenerate" electrons (most likely paired) which have tunneled through
a dielectric such as GaN. These degenerate electrons are then poised to
harness ZPE to expand.
The LED is looking to me like the key component in this circuit, but
nevertheless requiring the high-Q inductor as the "table-setter" for
sequential boosting from the LEDs. BTW it should be mentioned that the
bandgap of GaN, which is the semiconductor used in super-brite LEDs is
the same value in potential (or nearly so) as is both the mass-energy of
the electron anti-neturino, and exactly a quarter of the IP (ionization
potential) of the "epo" (i.e. virtual positronium)...for whatever that
"coincidence" is worth...
Jones
