Jones wrote: > http://newenergytimes.com/tgp/2007TGP/2007TGP-Report.htm ... > Seriously, the bulk of this data cannot be attributed to anything but nuclear > reactions, can it?
Talking about those CR-39 plastic chips tests, whether directly in the electrolyte, or with an intervening thin Mylar film, the DIESECF hypothesis predicts much more nuclear activity where the Pd cathode lightly touches the insulator (bottom of wire and tips of those of the codeposited PdDx dendrites that touch the plastic) than where the electrolyte gap is larger (sides and top of wire). Unfortunately I don't see how this can be proved, as any particles having gone through a large water gap wouldn't have enough energy left to make a track anyway, whether they exist or not.... :( Michel
