Jones Beene wrote:
Many observers had hoped that Miles' work with boron and his reported 100% reproducibility was accurate. Apparently not.
I am sure it was accurate. Miles is a very reliable source. However, the boron made not have played a role in the nuclear reaction. Perhaps it only helped the electrochemistry.
Let's please be careful not to dismiss reports as "inaccurate" just because they do not seem to jibe with other reports. Experimental data is often right even though it may not seem logical or understandable. It is huge mistake to think that just because your hypothesis is apparently wrong and boron does not contribute to the nuclear reaction, the data you based it upon must also be wrong. You have probably misinterpreted; the results probably stand.
- Jed
