Hunh, doesnt seem that way to me. High dispersal and insane surface to area ratio is known for doing just that in chemical reactions and explosions. Look at fuel air explosives.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:08 AM, R C Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Howdy Jones, > There's folks on Vo, and there's folks looking over the shoulder's of folks > on Vo. This group's attraction is passed on to many others and be assured " > they get it". I suppose your mention of "red mercury" did make a few ears > become "pointed". The Dime Box Saloon's Large Hadron tequila bottle toss > research project recently gained additional funding to study why thermite > can take years off one's life among spectators not wearing hard hats while > strolling past bldg 7. > Please continue to expound as only a Jones Beene "moment" can > stimulate. Lewis Carroll must be :) > Richard > > Jones wrote, >>Furthermore, few on Vo seems to be "getting" the potential importance of >> superthermite to LENR- that being that the energy output (as evidence in >> the explosiveness) has been reported to be an order of magnitude higher than >> chemical. > > Sure these reports are mostly anecdotal - after all the military does not > publish its most guarded secrets - even if there could be a valid civilian > use for the technology behind those secrets -- and consequently it is easy > for any skeptic to write this off ballotechnic stuff as SciFi ... and > totally unconnected to LENR. >
